NY: Bill wants to add Tier I (low level) registrants to public sex offender registry

Source: observertoday.com 4/23/26

[ACSOL note: Write, call and show up, NY residents!]

Assemblyman Andrew Molitor is among the co-sponsors of legislation that would require all sex offenders to be placed in the publicly searchable area of the state’s online sex offender registry.

Sponsored by Assemblyman Joseph Angelino, Binghamton, the legislation (A.10975) would amend the state’s Corrections Law to authorize the name, photo and other identifying information of Level 1 sex offenders to be publicly disclosed on the DCJS sex offender directory website.

Angelino’s bill has attracted…

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Somebody please dumb this down for me. I’m just not seeing how this incident would have been prevented if this registrant’s entry were publicly accessible. Assuming the release of the sheriff’s department ( https://sheriff.ongov.net/2025/06/onondaga-county-sheriffs-office-arrests-ryan-pontello-for-sexual-assault-of-a-child/ ) is reasonably accurate, there is absolutely no indication I can see that the registry would have made a difference even if his entry were publicly available. Not to mention that of all crimes he was indicated for, there isn’t one single registry violation among them.

I have doubts about the reporting’s accuracy. It seems pretty doubtful to me that a 5-year-old would be at a playground, unsupervised. So whatever supervision was there could not have been very attentive if they didn’t notice a stranger walking off with the child that they accompanied.

It’s very unlikely that someone in the neighborhood knew the registrant’s history despite not being publicly accessible and set him up. I remember reading a couple of Halloweens seasons ago about a guy who spent almost a year complaining and gathering signatures in failed attempts to chase out the registrant who lived across the street from him. By sheer coincidence [/sarc], it was his daughter who was supposedly lured into the registrant’s house.

Merely having doubts is not sticking up for the registrant here. If there is actual forensic evidence proving the allegations, burn him at the stake. I’ll light the match. But the point of this writing is to once again show the registry’s uselessness at its purported purpose. Note also that it’s a tiered registry, meaning it is more costly in terms of dollars and man-hours while remaining equally useless.

The modern GOP hasn’t met a punishment it didn’t want more people to receive. That’s really all there is to it. It’s ironic that these are the people who will be celebrating America’s 250th birthday the most publicly, since they’re also the people who absolutely would have sided with King George.