FL: Homeless Sex Offenders Must Move Again

Ever since the Julia Tuttle Causeway became an encampment for sex offenders more than a decade ago, officials have been trying to shoo the group away from the rest of civilization. Thanks to stringent requirements mandating that child predators live 2,500 feet from schools, parks, and daycare centers, the offenders have struggled to find legal housing, leaving many effectively homeless. For years, the roving offenders have been shuffled from one place to another, angering unlucky neighbors and nearby business owners. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

But of course, no federal or state judge finds anything wrong with any of this.

It somehow doesnt count as unconstitional banishment?

What are the statistics on how many registered citizens left the county due to this over the last decade?

Perhaps Mr book would help fund a place to put them if it had barbed wire and armed guards to essentially put these free people that did their time back in a prison.

“”If somebody wants to build something away from the general population, we would certainly encourage that,” Book says.”

Which is hardly the stated intent of Residency Restrictions / Jessica’s Law, which is to protect children of registrant abuse in places where children congregate, like schools, parks and day cares (which happens, like, never) by registrants residing less than a 10 minute stroll from aforementioned child centric places (which happens, really really, never).

His honesty that this is about banishment is actually quite refreshing.

btw – is the convicted criminal’s current criminal drunk driving case still active?

Meanwhile, Ron Book has earned his second DUI this one involving an accident that was his fault because he was intoxicated over the legal limit. Last year 10,874 people died in drunk driving accidents. over 1000 children were killed by drunk drivers. Did you hear that senator Lauren Book? 1000 children were murdered by people driving while they are intoxicated!!! Yet all those drunk drivers will get a second chance, a third chance like your father, a fourth and fifth chance. They will get their licenses back. They will all be on the road again. They are not on a registry. They could be living next to you. They could be living within 2000 feet of a liquor store, or a school cross walk, or a microbrewery. And Lauren–you do nothing. If you really cared about children you would be pushing for laws to protect all these children killed by drunk drivers. Why aren’t you??? Many people on the registry never even touched anyone. Their lives were forever destroyed for being on the computer. You make them live under bridges, without bathrooms, unemployable, destitute, but you have no problem with people getting multiple DUI’s. If you cared, you would be pushing for legislation.

This is a reason why I will not visit Florida or endorse it to anyone.

Blast her FB page, which is loaded with boasts of her saint-like altruistic community contributions, yet devoid of efforts to curb drunk driving.

https://m.facebook.com/book4senate/

Mr. Ron Book, & Mr. Jon Walsh are parents of victimized children. While each has experienced a different collateral outcome, each also feels a tremendous amount of psychological pain from their own choices. Facts are important.
A. Ron B. hired on the nanny to rear his child, as HE was to busy doing something else.
B. Jon W. after having been informed by his boy of his need to pee or poop, sent his son off to a public bathroom BY HIMSELF in a busy Mall, as HE was to busy doing something else.

The perpetrators, one female(molester), one male( killer) were enabled by errant personal choices. Guilt can be overwhelming especially parental guilt. Each parent feels helpless in the matter. Doing something, even if it’s the wrong thing, feels cathartic but each also pays a price for retribution as it will only extend those feelings into a career in victim’s stance. A very dangerous psychological space indeed.