MT: Former Missoula man sues over ‘outdated’ sodomy convictions, sex offender requirement

[kpvi.com – 3/25/21]

A man is taking Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen to federal court Tuesday for requiring people to register as sex offenders for past sodomy convictions.

Randall _____ , 45, was convicted when he was 19 years old under an Idaho law that criminalized sex acts associated with homosexuality, according to the lawsuit he filed in December in U.S. District Court for the District of Montana.

Because of that conviction, Randall was required to register as a sex offender with the Missoula County Sheriff’s Office.

“This case involves the lingering effects of centuries of homophobic ‘sodomy’ prohibitions,” wrote Matthew Strugar, Menges’ attorney, in the original complaint.

The registration requirement has ruined Menges’ life, Strugar said. People don’t believe him when he tells them why he is on the sex offender list.

However, in 2005 the Montana State Legislature changed the law so that anyone required to register as a sex offender in one state had to register as an offender in Montana. And Idaho, unlike Montana, still has a law against sodomy and oral sex and requires people convicted of the crimes to register as sex offenders under its Crimes Against Nature statute.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It’s insane how terrible so many of our laws are, and how dismissive pretty much the entire system is.

The fact that any state is still making being gay illegal is insane on its own. But what this man is going through is just ludicrous. How I wish there was a magic spell to force all involved to speak the truth.

***
However, in 2005 the Montana State Legislature changed the law so that anyone required to register as a sex offender in one state had to register as an offender in Montana.
***

Huh. So we can incorporate other state’s laws? Why can’t CA incorporated the age of consent of Connecticut, which is 16 years of age?

The registry isn’t criminal, but “merely statutory”. If it’s merely statutory, then why cannot Connecticut’s age of consent be used in any other state? The IML uses the state registry from all the states, making it a federal program. Why does Connecticut have a lower age of consent than many other states? Shouldn’t there be an equal protection law here against the IML?

Since it’s “merely statutory” and doesn’t hurt anyone criminally, then why not apply the age of consent to be 16 years of age for the registry since the federal government uses the IML on passports? Why is the federal government forcing to keep more people on the registry if it’s “merely a statutory” scheme?