CA: UK’s DailyMail spreads stereotypes and lies about registrants

Source: dailymail.co.uk 12/21/22

DailyMail.com’s analysis of a California sex offender database reveals that nearly 2,000 convicted pedophiles are living together in groups of three or more in ‘pedophile dens’ in the state

Some of the ‘pedophile dens’ are just a block away from schools

DailyMail.com also spoke to residents of the ‘dens’ and even got a tour of one property housing several child molesters

We can reveal that a $1million, 6-bed home in Northridge, California, with a tennis court, is home to six pedophiles with some of the most heinous crimes on the statute books

Law enforcement and current and former prosecutors of sex crimes told DailyMail.com the dens could be dangerous and create an ‘environment for more crimes to occur’

President of the Sacramento County Deputy Sheriff’s Association said, ‘These guys and gals have addictions, and to put them anywhere near a temptation is not serving them and it’s not serving the kids’ 

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh well, who cares if the the supreme court’s decisions offend the English? Margaret Thatcher said it best when you offend at least half the populace that means you’re doing something right.

I was trying to comment on the daily mail web site and you need to subscribe to comment, than i had seen he has an instagram thingy and you need to subscribe to that to_ If you look you can see he really does not have that big of a following! i wont waste my time on wasting my time.Oh and he did write a few articles on the royal family and separately Prince Andrew but he is “very Careful” on what he says The F***ing coward Josh Boswell

The DailyMail is just a tabloid which will print what sells. The real villians in this story are the sheriff and the former DA who were quoted in the article.

‘These guys and gals [sex offenders] have addictions, and to put them anywhere near a temptation is not serving them and it’s not serving the kids.’

‘If they’re all congregating with each other, it’s just creating the environment for more of these crimes to occur.

‘Even if they’re trying to stay clean, they’re in an environment where they’re around other pedophiles. They’re gonna be talking about children, having child porn available. And it’s just creating a situation where you’re almost sure there’s going to be another offense.’

Really??

The Daily Mail has been tabloid trash for a hundred years (even saw a swipe at it in a recent Agatha Christie adaptation). It’s pornographic, reactionary nonsense with a purely geriatric readership.

“Pedo dens.” Wow. This British rag is 100% pure unadulterated trash pedaling fake news for God knows how long. And anyone who wants to criticize my use of that term can stick it. In one of our recent drought years they pictured a workman jackhammering up the deck around a pool with the headline, “Californians Demolish Swimming Pools Due to Drought.” That was my intro to the Daily Mail, linked by another media cesspool, The Drudge Report.
They took a random picture of a laborer at work, news of our dry conditions and fabricated a totally false story around it. There is no reason to believe any information produced by that (fake) newspaper and fewer reasons to read it. It is bird cage liner, at best.

They refuse to print the critical comments. I’ve made 3 well over a week ago and still nothing. Just the one comment on support of the article.