CO: Colorado DOC Allows Some Prisoners Convicted of Sex Crimes to be Released While Delaying Parole Consideration for Others

Source: prisonlegalnews.org 6/1/26

Stonewalling by the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC) in providing treatment to people convicted of sexual offenses has allowed some of those people to be released without any treatment and at the same time delayed parole consideration for others. In 1998, Colorado lawmakers overhauled the system of sentencing and monitoring people convicted of sex offenses to include a lifetime supervision policy as a “comprehensive way to protect the public and stop further crimes.”

The new system required those convicted of sex offenses to receive treatment while incarcerated before they could be released and to be under continuous supervision after release. The new sentences for these crimes would be “indeterminate,” such as “two years to life,” meaning the person would be eligible for release on parole after two years, but could remain in prison for life if he or she would not or could not complete the treatment.

At the time the new system was adopted, former Adams County District Attorney Bob Grant praised the new approach, asserting “the problem is going to be addressed and that offender is not going to recidivate.” Well, the panacea of the new system has failed to reach fruition. Almost 30 years later, DOC officials have failed to hire sufficient staff to provide the legislatively mandated treatment. Several hundred prisoners in the DOC’s custody are on a waiting list for their turn to receive the treatment. As of July 2024, more than 160 of them were long past their parole eligibility dates but remained incarcerated “because of a years-long shortage of therapists and resistance by state officials for allowing alternative forms of treatment,” the Denver Post reported. Disturbingly, more than 2,000 people convicted of similar and even more severe crimes were released untreated in the past five years.

The prisoners released without treatment had “determinate” or “fixed” sentences that meant their release dates were certain and they had to be released whether or not the DOC provided treatment to them. And without treatment, they are generally at higher risk of returning to prison. DOC spokesperson Alondra Gonzalez-Garcia said the agency “was charged with carrying out laws passed by the legislature and that people released without treatment would still be required to receive it while under supervision in the community.”

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

0 Comments