Two decades later, has Megan’s Law delivered? (Opinion)

It’s been 20 years since New Jersey’s Legislature passed Megan’s Law. The two decades since have been filled with legal challenges and disappointment it didn’t accomplish what many thought it would. It’s what happens when politics and emotion team to shortcut the legislative process. Full Opinion Piece

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It has delivered votes, funding, fear mongering, vigilantism, division, hate mongering, emotional abuse to children and families of registrants, more broken homes than you might imagine, societal disenfranchisement, and a host of other subterfuge and advantages for political opportunists including a nearly death blow to constitutional protections.

Sadly as to the actual intention, it has only delivered the illusion of safety.

Lady Liberty has a tear running down her cheek.

Simply an EXCELLENT article!!! Bravo to the writer!

Well, the nature of the problem continues to be mis-stated. Here is a good example: you have a mentally deranged person attacking another person with violence. (And after the fact, politicians who try to harvest votes by decrying “sex”.)
Violence is the problem, violence perpetrated by a guy who was mentally askew.

When we restate the problem this way, then we can solve it: there are well known protocols for screening the population for mentally ill people. When you go to reception in a California prison, you are screened by psychologists, looking for signs of mental problems. Further analysis and treatment can then be provided. That should eliminate or reduce any tendency to violence.
While incarcerated I encountered some people I thought were potentially very violent; those are the ones to worry about and warn about. Guys whose main interest was sex tried to make themselves as agreeable as possible—–for obvious reasons.

polotcians are no more than telavagelist after your money but tell you it is to save your soul, Jesus paid that price for you, making all these harsher laws is not the answer, the answer is to tell your kids don’t talk to strangers and don’t go with them and yell weirdo over and over again because in nature we are supposed to talk to one another an such, and instead of prison or jail what about help so if they are a ped. they have help not to do it again, but by not letting them get a job or housing any crimminal would commit a crime again to eat or sleep, what happened to paying you debt to society? If you can’t pay your debt and show your not a danger why would anyone care and i don’t mean to harm another person i mean there own life or stealing to live or turn to drugs and alcohal, “LET HE WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE” love your neibor as you love your self.