Orange County DA (Tony Rackauckus), where does he get his info?

Admin

“Anybody who has worked in the system for a while knows that sexual crimes are the ones that are repeated the most – we’ve had case after case of recidivist sex offenders…”

Video of Santa Ana City Council Meeting here – OCDA @13:30

Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If those facts are true there wouldn’t be any sex offenders free from prison.. let me check.. yup those are home addresses on the list, not jails or prisons

0
Reply

Just watched the video and cannot believe that this is Orange County’s top prosecutor! I consider myself somewhat versed in the subject but I could barely follow his train of thought, and I use that term loosely. That appearance was entirely lacking in organization, substance and presentation. Epic Fail.

How can he say these things on the record and not know the facts / research? Not be able to dispute them, but admit that he has not seen them / is not aware? Quote “I do not know what the numbers are”. How many of these speeches had they given at this point? I am still quite unclear on what a parolee inheriting a property adjacent to a park has to do with prohibiting someone with a decade-old conviction having a picnic there.

How coherent and organized was the speech by the registrant’s daughter! A+

I now have watched several of these City Council presentations and I have yet to hear of one (1) actual crime being committed (resulting in an arrest at a minimum) by a registrant in a public park – that might be justification for these ordinances, however lame and unjust that might be. Not one.

Am I in the wrong movie???

0
Reply

I’m honestly speechless. When I was a young man, I really never questioned authority and always had a great deal of respect for authorities. I always and truly believed that people in such positions had both ethical and moral responsibility to uphold the law and always seek and tell the truth. This is no longer valid. I personally feel there are some serious credibility issues here and its truly very sad.

0
Reply