To help ex-cons, ban the box

The most telling predictor of whether an ex-offender will reenter the community as a law-abiding and productive member, or whether instead he or she will return to jail or prison, is employment. Former inmates with steady jobs have fairly high success rates. For those who can’t find work, prospects are dismal. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

How about this…make it a law that employees can’t know about a person’s criminal past unless it directly relates to the job in some way. If a person is a registered sex offender and his crime involved a teenage girl, why should that ever have any bearing on him getting a job where he’s not around teenage girls??? If a person’s crime is stealing cars, that should not matter if he’s trying to get a job in an office. Bottom line, if people can get jobs, they aren’t as likely to commit new crimes. If someone is concerned about recividism of any crime, then only make that person’s past crimes that are relevant available to employers! Oh wait, perhaps this is too much logic for politicians, their heads might explode…

This is almost something. But far too little. Its government employers only. And even they still get to consider the conviction before hiring you. And they’re not sitting around looking to be social workers, they’re in personnel and they are acting on written black-and-white policies, they don’t care what your story is. This proposal is decidedly useless if they are following black-and-white policies.

Better would be something more like the policy that employers like Bloomberg use. At Bloomberg, they specifically explain that you need reveal only felonies, and only felonies that are less than five years old. Once that five year mark passes, they don’t care any more, figure you have passed the test of time. (May I once again mention the 10-year minimum mark we pushing for with the tiers, even for the lowest of misdemeanors? Even private employer Bloomberg is more enlightened than that, so why aren’t we. We should at least substantially reduce the time for offenses not on the federal list, of which Calif. has many, if not outright drop SOR for those).

This proposed law must apply to ALL employers, and it should not allow even asking about a misdemeanor, and no felonies older than five years. What’s proposed here is window dressing, not some real relief. It sounds like a lot more ethan it is — just how politicians like it.

This is a really great article! I was convicted of a wobble and I can’t tell you how hard I worked at getting it expunged. I eventually went into banking. I mean, this is a no brainer. When people are working, starting families, married and have mortgages, people are typically more responsible. Its common sense. Truly.. I remember as a young man getting hair cut at a barber shop. Well, the barber was a bigot. I still to this day recall him telling me how he hired a great guy and somehow an ex con came in and he found out about it/he fired him? Everyone makes mistakes. Seriously. To this day, I still recall the story. The idea behind incarceration is to allow people to reflect on their misgivings and be punished. IF we continue to hold their past against them, how will they ever move forward? A miracle? Well, miracles are far and between. More people need to realize the need to help those who help themselves.

Couple months back I applied with a Walmart distribution center in AZ. I was called for an interview, then got to the point of the drug and background check. Drug was clean. I was denied employment but my report does not state why. Can someone comment? Is it because I am a felon..a sex offender? I’ve read since they only go back 7 years, wait until then.

This Walmart distribution center, like most, is in the middle of nowhere with no children in sight at all. If I can’t get a job there, where can I?

Thanks