Manufacturing Fear: Halloween Laws for Sex Offenders

In North Carolina, a sheriff tells parents to check the online sex offender registry before allowing children to trick-or-treat. In Montana, a town offers a “trunk-or-treat” event where kids can get Halloween candy from trunks of cars in a parking lot to avoid potential danger. In New York, “Operation Halloween: Zero Tolerance” prohibits sex offenders from wearing masks or costumes or answering their doors on Halloween, and, as a parole source says, “There is certainly nothing more frightening than the thought of one of these men opening their door to innocent children.” In Oklahoma, a city council is considering an ordinance forbidding sex offenders from decorating their homes or passing out candy on Halloween. In Orange, California, sex offenders can’t answer their door or have outside lighting on Halloween, but an additional ordinance requiring window signs saying, “No candy or treats at this residence” was recently revoked after attorneys argued it was a form of cruel and unusual punishment. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wow, a commentary from the popular press that exposes the modern day witch hunt. Suggestion: drop the sex offender terminology. It is suggestive, does nothing but cloud the truth, is used to create suspicion and fear in the masses.

I’m beginning to scratch my head? 1.3 percent recedivism rate? What if a gang member answered the door? Murderer? Pedophile? Rapist? Serial killer? Pervert? Drunk? What if? I’m beginning to wonder about police departments? What if your child went up to a crack house? I truly find these ordinances disturbing! I feel that in the long run, banning someone from participating in any holiday will be over turned and its surreal to think any city official creating these ordinances has any intellectual capital! It’s only going to take 1 lawsuit to overturn this (a lawsuit going all the way). As a reminder, the race isn’t always won by the swiftest or fastest, but by those who keep running!

Interesting, but it’s something we already know…RSO’s present little to no danger to society. Fact is, your teenage daughter has a greater chance of being molested by a cop during a traffic stop than by some “trench coat wearing, lurking in the shadows” RSO. We just want to live quiet, productive lives, but the debt is never paid, our beloved gov’t keeps upping the ante…

“Bubba the Love Sponge” places PREDATOR signs in yards of RSO’s.

This is actionable, and RSO’s should look into arresting Sponge (?) for trespassing, as well considering a lawsuit not just against Sponge but against the radio station, including an FCC complaint. This is a criminal violation, and had this been done to anyone for ANY reason other than for RSO identification, he would be in jail and broke by the end of the year from criminal and civil judgments.

If Bubba did this in California I’m sure CA RSOL would be all over this.