NH: Sex Offender Says He Should Be Able To Attend Church

CONCORD, N.H. —A convicted sex offender took his fight to attend church to the state Supreme Court on Wednesday. A lower court told Jonathan Perfetto that he couldn’t go to church because his suspended sentence prohibits him from being around children. Perfetto was convicted in 2002 of possessing 61 images of child pornography.

Barbara Keshen of the New Hampshire American Civil Liberties Union told the court that Perfetto, a Jehovah’s Witness, has a fundamental right to go to the church of his choice and should be permitted to be around the children of the congregation as long as he has a chaperone.  But Assistant Attorney General Nicholas Cort argued that using a chaperone is unrealistic.

“It would be too dangerous and unrealistic to expect a single person to be able to keep an eye on him every minute of every meeting every week,” Cort said. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What happened to separation of church and state? I suppose they never heard of that, or ex post facto either, just like the rest of courts in amerika.

Denying a registrant access to fellowship from caring individuals who share his faith not only encroaches upon his freedom but that of his congregation.
Megan’s law clearly describes those registrants thought to be a danger to children for anyone to view and protect themselves against.
Therefore, any further restrictions on registrants is superfluous and without merit, when adults are overseeing the adolescents.
This should be a fight not only from this registrants point of view but from any American who values their freedom.
I noticed early in my childhood that my church was filled with what society might consider the undesirables: the old, the crippled, the ugly, the weird and they felt loved and wanted. Wasn’t this the foundation of Christianity, to love one another regardless of their imperfections?
For the government to unduly restrict this individuals right to religious fellowship is truly a fight worthy of support from any thinking individual.

I sincerely hope the Supreme Court rules with intelligence in this case. What does the idiot Assistant AG think he might do IN CHURCH??? Whip out his laptop and look at illegal pictures???