Do sex offender registries, like new ‘OffenderWatch,’ make us safer? (Op-Ed)

Today the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office announced it was launching “OffenderWatch,” a brand-new way to be scared of your neighbors. …

I have a few questions: Why? And what, exactly, are you to do with this information? Do you commit these names and faces to memory? What are you supposed to do when you meet one of these guys on the street? Do you instruct your kids to stay away from these homes? Are we supposed to keep an eye on them in some way? Should we organize patrols to watch them? Should we be careful not to hire them? Should we make sure they remain outsiders for the rest of their days? Full Opinion Piece

Related posts

Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Surely state law preempts any localities from posting sex offenders online. Seems to me 290 takes over that entire area of posting online, preempting counties and municipalities from doing so.

In fact, this is pushing this information out. 290 explicitly bars localities from pushing out information to people except for specific registrants deemed to be of especially high risk, and then only to individuals or groups that would be affected, not to everyone all over the world online. Again, that would bar localities from making their own sex offender Websites postings the registrants.

No; they don’t.

No, but a drunk driver registry (for habitual repeat offenders) or a murderer registry might…just might (although doubtful).

New sex offenses are done the vast majority of the time by those whom the victim knows…NOT a stranger.

Additionally, those on this list are the most likely NOT to reoffend. Watching them is a waste of time and simple provides a false sense of security which probably HAS DIRECTLY CONTRIBUTED to more children being abused THAN IT HAS PREVENTED.

Yes, that’s right…your list has harmed more children than it has protected!

Merely knowing or not knowing something does not make anybody safe. All information in of itself is neutral, how it is gathered and used will determine what power it has. Throughout the United States a serious misconception exists regarding sex offenders and most ex-offenders as a whole; it’s the notion that everyone can nicely fit under one governing umbrella. There are vast differences between a cocaine user and a cocaine dealer, just like a world of difference exists between someone who committed a hands on offense verses someone who committed a hands off offense.

Know what really makes people safer? Action, yes I used that fantastic a word everyone likes to throw around. “Actions speak louder than words”, blah blah blah….here’s a novel idea; why don’t we throw some effort into preventing people from ever getting into a position where they eventually get labeled as a sex offender? Better yet, let us really advocate for ways to prevent (stop) sex offenses before they can ever occur. This is not about busting down someones door just prior to them raping another person or surrounding that creepy van seconds before a child enters it. No, we must go father back and prevent the rapist or kidnapper from becoming a kidnapper or a rapist. If this sounds like too much work, well enjoy a future where more bad crap happens and everyone complains but does nothing to address the root problems.