ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (6/12 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


CA: Most Sex Offender Parolees Exempt from Ban

Three-quarters of California’s paroled sex offenders previously banned from living near parks, schools and other places where children congregate now face no housing restrictions after the state changed its policy in response to a court ruling that said the prohibition only applies to child molesters, according to data compiled at the request of The Associated Press. Full Article

In other news outlets

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please do not solicit funds
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Time to begin some rough drafts of letters for our legislators in 2016.

Runner disagreed. She intends to try again next year to pass stalled legislation that would let judges in each county decide if the 2,000-foot limit is too restrictive in their jurisdiction.

“Unfortunately, that many people coming from transient to living near schools is not good,” Runner said.”

The Runners must be bitter pill to be around. I wonder how many friends to they have left? The few they have, must be the sound of a squealing grinding machine.

At some point in time, each of those judges will come to terms with reality and find themselves opposed to the extreme and Nazi like protocol of these fabled and nefarious demagogues.

Sharon has a case of revisionist history. Her legislation wasn’t stalled, as most of us know. She was given a homework assignment by the Public Safety Committee, including a meeting with the CASOMB, and then to come back with a reworked bill. She decided against it, opting for the time-honored concept that short memories will allow her to try again with a clean slate.

She is right about one thing, though. Through the Red, or should I say, “Sex” scare tactics of her, her husband, and their ilk, a huge percentage of voters passed their hateful legislation. What she conveniently neglects to mention is that voters (and, clearly, politicians) do not care if a measure is constitutional or not. Just package it nicely as a panacea against the boogeyman and its a guaranteed passage.

So true. Senator Runner took her ball and went home like a pouting child. Why is it that these journalists cannot or won’t do a nano-second of research? How long would it take to listen to last summer’s hearing? When have ‘journalists’ become a mouthpiece for politicians and law enforcement?

Make no mistake: The flurry of targeted, focused lawsuits brought about by Janice and CA RSOL have made the impact that you see in this decision. Without the tenacity of this organizations and its officers, the court’s decision may have gone in an entirely different, and disappointing, direction.

NOTE: This decision was so impactful it made (mostly) conservative’s list of Top 10 events that happened today.

Maybe an initiative could pass that bars people who do not apply the constitution in their capacities as legislators, from being within 2,000 miles of an US citizen.

Yay! No if only I can go drop off / pick up my daughter from daycare, and take her to the park…

you are absolutely right. If we didn’t have Janice et el than we would probably be facing circumstances such as those in Florida and other regimes across this country…..I said it before and Ill say it again her and her staff are true patriots and protectors of the constitution from these domestic terrorist politicians that swore allegiance to it simply for their personal agendas. These politicians are more dangerous to this country than Isis ever will be…They are the domestic terrorist that need to be put on watch-lists every time they try to enact unconstitutional laws……

Also come next year when runner says she will push for her legislation on this issue, I am sure she will be able to provide instances where there was some kind of crime that had occurred of sex offenses by the parolees that can now live off the streets or near schools right????????????????? If not ,which I am sure will be the case, just how could she justify her legislation??????

Stupid is as stupid does. In this case with a heaping helping of hate.

Runner? again ?

Well, I do have to agree with Senator Runner. Nobody would probably want to live near a registered citizen, with the way officials attempt to portray them. I also wouldn’t want to live near gang members, drug dealers, convicted murderers, drunks, spousal abuser, homeless shelter, a busy school, rude neighbor, barking dog, gas station, nuclear plant or manufacturing plant. Life isn’t perfect. The senator is clearly ignorant, obviously doesn’t read statistics, nor realizes allowing people to be treated like human beings and have family support is part of rehabilitation. I might suggest she educate herself, prior to making such comments.

Sharon Runner is a broken bearing that needs to be remove and thrown in the trash pile. As long she remains she will cause more damages and is dangerous. She and George Runners built a legacy of destroying people’s lives without any cause. They are a fraud to Jesus Christ, a compassioned Lord, whom they claim to serve. They spent a career trying chase people from their homes, claiming “danger to children”, which, have been proven not be the case, as a distraction from ones that can and did come in their Christian School and harmed children under their watch. The Runner’s and their self-righteous wing nuts need to stop riding a dead horse and let the Parole Officers consecrate on the less one percent, that is coming out prison to insure safety of all.

So what does this mean to People living in California on Federal Supervised Release?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x