ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021

General News

Loretta Lynch’s false claim on sex trafficking arrests

This is a story about how the language regarding the crime of sex trafficking has become so fuzzy that even the nation’s top law enforcement officer can speak before an international audience and utter wildly inflated statistics.

Throughout 2015, The Fact Checker has dug into dubious statistics concerning sex trafficking, so this recent speech by Attorney General Lynch caught our eye. Lynch has taken a keen interest in sex trafficking, recently announcing more than $44 million in grant funding to combat human trafficking in the United States, including supporting law-enforcement task forces and victims services organizations. She devoted a significant part of her speech to Interpol to discussing sex trafficking.

But laudable efforts to help victimized children can be undermined when advocates resort to hyperbole to tout their success. Let’s explore how that happened here. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Exaggerations have been the mainstay in the sex offender/sex trafficking hysteria arenas. The saddest part is that LE, whom should dwell in the house of truth are themselves the biggest perpetrator of lies. God! Save America.

This is why there is virtually no difference between Socialists and Republicans when it comes to sex offender issues. It provides them with a rare “oppurtunity for bi-partisan agreement.” Sickening.

There are no actual socialists in the United States Congress. Democrats, Republicans, and a few Independents, but no Socialists. Which would be problematic anyway because just like any other social or political perspective there exists varying degrees of agreement with ideals. By default identifying as anything doesn’t mean 100% agreement with everything aspect of positions backed by the label. You want to know what an actual socialist believes? First socialist solutions would likely not start on the political front, but the social one. Second any solutions regarding sex offender issues would end and not begin with those labeled as sex… Read more »

My apologies. I meant to use small s and small r socialists and republicans respectively to indicate the measurement of governence, not the actual parties that ostensibly encompass such ideals. In general, I tend not to use party affiliations, but rather levels of governance. I essentially view the Democratic Party as socialist in its current iteration. It is a measure of centralist vs. decentralist control, and the meter of today’s Democratic Party is the same as the Socialist rating on the Communist Party of America value meter. It is not the same Democratic Party that had been fairly centrist until… Read more »

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x