ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

General News

Loretta Lynch’s false claim on sex trafficking arrests

This is a story about how the language regarding the crime of sex trafficking has become so fuzzy that even the nation’s top law enforcement officer can speak before an international audience and utter wildly inflated statistics.

Throughout 2015, The Fact Checker has dug into dubious statistics concerning sex trafficking, so this recent speech by Attorney General Lynch caught our eye. Lynch has taken a keen interest in sex trafficking, recently announcing more than $44 million in grant funding to combat human trafficking in the United States, including supporting law-enforcement task forces and victims services organizations. She devoted a significant part of her speech to Interpol to discussing sex trafficking.

But laudable efforts to help victimized children can be undermined when advocates resort to hyperbole to tout their success. Let’s explore how that happened here. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Exaggerations have been the mainstay in the sex offender/sex trafficking hysteria arenas. The saddest part is that LE, whom should dwell in the house of truth are themselves the biggest perpetrator of lies. God! Save America.

This is why there is virtually no difference between Socialists and Republicans when it comes to sex offender issues. It provides them with a rare “oppurtunity for bi-partisan agreement.” Sickening.

There are no actual socialists in the United States Congress. Democrats, Republicans, and a few Independents, but no Socialists. Which would be problematic anyway because just like any other social or political perspective there exists varying degrees of agreement with ideals. By default identifying as anything doesn’t mean 100% agreement with everything aspect of positions backed by the label.

You want to know what an actual socialist believes? First socialist solutions would likely not start on the political front, but the social one. Second any solutions regarding sex offender issues would end and not begin with those labeled as sex offenders. Third the starting point for fixing the problems from a social point of view is targeting anyone who is not yet labeled a sex offender and doing everything possible to insure they don’t ever get the label applied to them. While simultaneously doing everything humanly possible to prevent anyone from being a future victim. Finally because of all the ramifications of everything else sex offense law changes would either have changed to accommodate the extremely low amount of offenses and former offenders or could be changed so easily that being against serious revision/repeal could be political suicide at every level of government.

Oh and all this change would be pushed not as reducing sex offenses, but as part of a much larger and complex effort to stabilize human civilization across all of life on a global scale. That’s what fighting for equality and fairness looks like, not cherry picking one slice of issues, but taking the whole pie and fighting for everyone to be able to have an equal or as close to equal slice as possible.

My apologies. I meant to use small s and small r socialists and republicans respectively to indicate the measurement of governence, not the actual parties that ostensibly encompass such ideals.

In general, I tend not to use party affiliations, but rather levels of governance. I essentially view the Democratic Party as socialist in its current iteration. It is a measure of centralist vs. decentralist control, and the meter of today’s Democratic Party is the same as the Socialist rating on the Communist Party of America value meter. It is not the same Democratic Party that had been fairly centrist until the early nineties, then started to trend socialist, until today, President Obama’s policies are virtually no different than Joseph Stalin’s policies, sans violence.

This is not a judgment of political belief, but in general, the more centralized a structure, the more difficult it is to readjust unjust laws such as the registry away, and the more likely we get more judges that also feel the same way over time. Creative interpretationists of the Constitution are currently our worst pragmatic enemy, even more than the legislators (US and State senates, representatives, and delegates) and executive branch members (governors, US President).

Impulsively, many of us lean toward socialist values here, but intuitively we are wrong for the most part in thinking that translates to a better chance at righting this ship. In general, the US and state constitutions were designed to devolve power to the individual, but the past 20 years that compact has been decimated by both parties.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x