After Cosby’s accusers testify, Legislature weighs eliminating statute of limitations for sex crimes

After wrenching testimony that included accounts from three alleged victims of comedian Bill Cosby, a Senate committee on Tuesday gave its first approval to a bill that would allow sex crimes to be prosecuted no matter how long ago they occurred. Full Article

SB 813

Leyva – Justice for Victims Act – Press Conference 4-12-16

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

whatever happened to a crime having to be committed and actual evidence being needed to prosecute someone instead of just circumstantial evidence or testimony from a alleged victim? although people tend to believe the accusations because so many different women have made the claim i would have to ask where is the proof? until someone has some actual evidence that he committed these acts he can’t or shouldn’t be able to be convicted.

its got to were they know how easy it is to convict, that its like they taste the blood like wild dogs , they just want more , getting there fix ,

20 years later, no one should be convicted on a he said/she said basis. How can anyone defend themselves when memories fail and no physical evidence was collected? In Cosby’s case, these were grown woman that could have reported the crime within the statute of limitations. 50 women who all failed to report the crime in a timely matter sounds suspicious. For those that reported the crimes in a timely manner, they certainly deserve there day in court to seek justice. Not saying he didn’t do any of the crimes, but when it comes to large Hollywood lawsuits that could be had, there certainly is the possibility that “some” of the women are trying to jump on the money train. If this passes, the number of registered citizens will certainly greatly rise. More civil suits, more money for law enforcement, more money for the prison system, more money for (victim’s and defendant’s) therapists and more money for victim’s rights groups.