NY: Danger to society: Shouldering the cost of housing sex offenders

Sex offenders virtually “disappear” in civil confinement, undergoing long rituals of behavioral and psychological therapy, from pinpointing and managing sexual arousal factors to polygraph tests uncovering dark sexual histories.

If successful, they can be released into the community under intensive supervision. If unsuccessful and still deemed a public risk, they can remain in confinement — indefinitely. And while some in the public see this as a plus, concerns are already being raised by state officials about the sustainability and cost of a program that continues to grow in numbers with few success stories to cite. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Lol…no success stories because nobody is let out!

That comments section… smh

It’s like a microcosm of society. In the article, it cites that less than 1 percent of those registered go to the Psych Facilities, but commentor believes ALL registrants go to the Psych ward despite the actual fact stated of how much of the registrant population goes there. Also, near the conclusion of the article, it states a 9.9% (awfully high compared to CASOMB’s less than 1%) recidivism rate for the treated offenders. I suppose that doesn’t include offenders who don’t need treatment.

So… until the SCOTUS fixes their totes obvee mistake of “high and frightening” which has caused an unnecessary backlash on a specific community to where an Angel program was created and the IML places even more limitations, the masses will believe the fear b/c it’s louder than the truth.

First fight first…

The Civil Commitment option should help the rest of us abolish the registry scheme because that commitment is the narrowly tailored way to deal with those that are a danger to society, and is granted by the court system. The registry on the other-hand, bypasses the court system completely and creates a secondary system that essentially violates separation of powers by having the legislation dictate punishment, protection of public, and re-integration without the fairness of judges and appeal options.

After we get the registry abolished we can focus on getting those out of Civil Commitment that should get out.