Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of June 2026. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil. This section is not intended for posting links to news articles without additional relevant comment.
Is this a police retaliation arrest? (Ring Doorbell Video / Audio Evidence)
Police detective called defendants (me) work phone after not disclosing what he wanted after asking for the subject he was told to shove a dildo up his ass. (it is believed the detective immediately obtained a warrant) and detective and 2 other law enforcement officers proceeded to immediately proceeded to defendant home and executed the arrest warrant as captured in the ring doorbell video. towards the end where defendant is walked to vehicle the officer stated what were what i think is plainly retaliatory words \\\ I have the link up on youtube in a private video but im kind of scared to post it this publicly on camera officer was heard making a comment something to the extend that this could of been different (or something very similar) advise please
(arrest was for a civil violation for not reg. vehicle within 24 hours)
*This was not in CA. but i think what i captured on camera is disturbaing for the cop to insuate that had persone not told him to “shove _$(^%^% up his AZz” that it would of been different
+++ Also to note im 99.999% positive i heard talk between these officers in the car that they were surprised how fast he got a warrant
Happy Father’s Day to all those here in the forum it is applicable to and those who have carried the role without being one.
You.know when law enforcement (“LE”) periodically have those big headline sweeps with names like “Project Angel Save” and LE arrest 50 allrged perpetrators and rescue 19 at risk minors…. I can’t help but think, “Yu knew fur some time where this missing child was…. But you, LE, chose to wait for a ” rescue” until you could make big headlines with lots of arrests.
well, apparently, LE plays the same games with deadly drugs: DEA allowed staggering amounts of fentanyl to hit streets and took no action, records show
Regarding “People vs Trout-Castro” (sp), I’m very interested in this case.
I have a CA 288.2 felony conviction from almost 30 years ago that was reduced to a misdo in 2000, yet in 2021 I was placed into Tier 3 anyway, based upon the SB 384 statutes, (if I’m using word “statute” correctly). I’ve been told that — for now — neither the DOJ or anyone else can override my Tier 3 classification unless the legislature re-writes the law.
If the courts side with Trout-Castro, could some or all p(17) midso 288.2 cases be moved to Tier 1? Obviously I’d be very happy and relieved. I want my old life back as a “no-post.”
@ TS
One of my favorite lady podcast Hysteria has an episode of this fu*king guy about our very own Chief Justice John Roberts. My hope is someday soon he will be removed from being a justice and put in prison so he gets to experience a price club membership from Hell.
In 2003 Smith v Doe the Supreme Court held that Alaska’s registry is not punishment for an offense, but it laid out boundaries that, if crossed, would make the Alaska registry subject to ex post facto.
In 2008, observing those boundaries, the Supreme Court of Alaska found that the state had crossed the boundary lines set in Smith and held that the Alaska registry is now punishment.
Why are all the other courts rubberstamping that the Supreme Court held registries are not punishment, disobeying Smith by excluding why?
Just like the Ellingburg decision was only about the MVRA, likewise, the Smith court was only about how Alaska’s registry operated at that time.
When an act of the legislature redefines a criminal offense, adding to the duties and restrictions imposed on those who commit it, this is not a civil act, and these changes cannot be applied retroactively unless as parole conditions that end with the original parole term!
This is actually how the New York Legislature wrote SORA to apply. The courts changed it by legislating from the bench, stating if the legislature doesn’t like it, then they must say so, and they haven’t.
Meanwhile, I’m sure the legislature does like it, but the bill would not have passed if they had written it to apply retroactively beyond parole conditions, which is why they didn’t.
Instead, they colluded with the courts to do it for them to get it done!
Such BS!
Looks like a walnut Creek California teen was out hunting with a BBC gun, pfr’s from the hit list. But he was under 18 and they are protecting his name. But it also looks like he was selling drugs to fellow students. Such a hypocrite!!! When will we see some lawsuits about the public registry.
The House of Representatives voted 420-0 to pass a privileged resolution mandating the public disclosure of lawmakers who have used taxpayer funds to settle sexual misconduct allegations. Let’s see the hypocrisy come alive.
There was one who voted present…she is from the state of South Carolina and just lost in the primary to be the next governor of that state who currently is not a very happy camper in life overall.
Thank you for giving us the good news Janice. AB 2753 got rejected. Registrants can now run for public office out of their own desire and choice. I’m inferring from this that at least some government officials are recognizing that we, the registrants can learn and train ourselves to control our behaviors and be morally and ethically sound. I personally believe that we can make better laws and lead the people to establish peace, harmony and unity together.
If I am off the Ca registry ( 5 yrs off misdemeanor CP ) Do I have any obligation to tell Az if I move there? I have read different accounts and contacted two lawyers that told me two different things. One said no reason to and other said i must register and then apply for removal again.
Where’s the outrage on those 16 kids hidden from view living in unsanitary conditions in Ohio? Does the public only get out their pitch forks and torches for sex crimes?
Sex shouldn’t be used to take kids away from spouses/partners, sex shouldn’t be used to concoct a plan to end someones career due to revenge or vengeance, sex offense registry shouldn’t be used as a hit list to commit a crime against those you hate based on myths , and sex shouldn’t be looked down upon in the ” Greatest country in the world.” Sex brought us all into the world and a sex crime shouldn’t take some of us out because we are listed on a unless registry, Time for the United States to turn in their childish views on sex and grow up.
The “Takings Clause” Alternative
When states try to hide behind sovereign immunity to steal intellectual property or likenesses, lawyers increasingly fight back using the 5th Amendment’s Takings Clause. The Constitution states that the government cannot take private property for public use without “just compensation”. Because your Name, Image, and Likeness is legally considered your personal property, lawyers argue that the state using your face to make money is an unconstitutional “taking,” bypassing sovereign immunity entirely. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Ultimately, while the state is violating your civil property rights, nobody is going to jail. The remedy is entirely financial, and the battle must be fought through specialized government claims boards rather than a standard criminal courtroom. [1, 2, 3]
If you are interested, we can look at real-world examples where photographers or creators successfully fought a state government over intellectual property, or explore how local city governments handle these risks. [1]