IL: Lawmakers eliminating time-frame protection for child sex offenders

Those who suffered sexual abuse and assault as children decades ago may soon be able to obtain justice by having their victimizers prosecuted.

State Sen. Scott Bennett, D-Champaign, introduced Senate Bill 189 in January, which would eliminate the statute of limitations for all felony child abuse and sexual assault crimes. It already passed the Senate Criminal Law Committee, of which Bennett is a member, with a 10-0 vote March 7 and is now awaiting a full Senate vote, according to Illinois legislative records. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Any law bypassing protections afforded by statutes of limitation will set a very bad precedent. What kind of evidence, if any, would remain 20, 30 years after an alleged incident? Or memories of what exactly transpired, and when, for that matter? Any accusation would be pretty much a he said-she said situation, which would open the door to false accusations, to which there’d be no defense. So, pretty much the exact reasons for the existence of statutes of limitation in the 1st place.

This would be a very bad precedent indeed.

Do you really want to be a victim forever?
That’s what this sounds like, an endorsement for people who have had a bad thing happen in their life to carry it with them and years down the road sue for financial windfalls, rather than trying to move past it and get on with their lives.
Lawyers love this, they can make money years after the fact by taking these cases to court. Victims who are easily coerced by lawyers will love this, they can cash in and get big bucks.
We’ve all had bad things happen to us at some point in our lives. The key is to deal with it, make your life better in spite of it, not get rich quick years later by re-hashing it so some lawyer can exploit you and make a name for themselves.. You’ve got to shed the “victim” label a some point.

It’s called the victimhood industry. A tactic used by those in control to further divide and conquer.
I think they used the Cosby shenanigans to promote a debate about statute of limitations, gage the public sentiment, control the narrative, and then roll out legislation ( that was already prepared and written) across the country to do away with those terrible “loopholes” called statute of limitations.

Then when it’s all done, let Cosby off the hook, and thank him for his participation in their scheme.

Abuse does occur, but it won’t be the poor who will be targeted by these laws. It will be anyone who has done well for themselves. With the internet now you can find out just about anything about anyone you knew decades ago- their financial status, even zoom in to see how many swimming pools they have.

No statute of limitations for treason in Illinois? Really? Is Illinois their own country now where they have that right to a treason charge? Now, they want no statute of limitations on this? Makes no sense….