ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (6/12 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

General News

The Unjust, Irrational, and Unconstitutional Consequences of Pedophilia Panic

“Sounds like you enjoy sex with kids,” a reader tweeted at me after seeing a blog post I wrote about former Subway pitchman Jared Fogle. It was 2015, and Fogle had just signed a plea agreement in which he admitted to looking at child pornography and having sex with two 16-year-old prostitutes. “You also look like [a] pervert,” the reader added.

That’s the sort of response you can expect if you write about the broad category known as “sex offenders” and suggest that not all of them are the same or that some of them are punished too severely. In this case, I had noted that the decision to prosecute Fogle under federal law, which had been justified by factors that had little or nothing to do with the gravity of his offenses, had a dramatic impact on the penalty he was likely to receive. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please do not solicit funds
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The truth is there will always be those who take things to an extreme. It is prevalent on almost EVERY topic. The problem sex offenders have is there is no rational voice in the mix to sort of ground the extremes. The intelligent, cordial sex offender usually isn’t willing to draw attention to himself out of shame and no one else who hasn’t been branding is willing to raise their voice either.

To me, the modern day sex offender is the perfect example of a minority in need of help from the tyranny of the majority. Yet, the courts have turned a blind eye.

“Stigmatizing these people as a threat to children everywhere for the rest of their lives may seem irrational, but that does not mean it fails the rational basis test. “Under rational basis review,” Hamilton explained, “a law ‘may be overinclusive, underinclusive, illogical, and unscientific and yet pass constitutional muster.'”

Well, it doesn’t pass constitutional muster when the constitution includes “No Bill of Attainder may be passed”.

Those who don’t know the basics of a Bill of Attainder can see it on wikipedia.

Chris F , I concur with your observation.

The sex offender list are in Form & Function a classic Bill of Attainder, which is forbidden by the Constitution: The state cannot single out citizens for Harsher Punishment or Treatment because they are on any list. I hold to the Reality that the list Violate Equal Protection and Equal Privileges Protections in the Federal and State Constitutions—the government can’t teat people differently, under the law.

Furthermore, the fact that the list is by De Facto Perpetual Punishment when we take into Account the Evil (Want Invoking) that the IML law will produce, and there is no Effective Way or Path for a person to challenge one’s status on the Offender & IML lists, would seem to violate constitutional due-process protections.

In addition focus can not be denied in viewing the violation of Ex Post Fact protections.

In the words of Edmund Burke ” The only thing necessary for triumph of evil, is for good to do nothing”

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x