Federal officials have advised Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale to put the brakes on setting up a publicly accessible database of high-risk child sex offenders. Full Article
Related posts
-
Canada: Registrants have the same low re-offense risk as the general public after about 10 years of being offence-free in the community
Source: utpjournals.press 7/3/2023 The public is justifiably concerned about the risk presented by individuals with a... -
Canada: Police link suicide of 12-year-old Prince George, B.C., boy to online sexual extortion
Source: cbc.ca 11/27/23 Police in Prince George, B.C., are warning about the dangers of sexual extortion... -
Canada: Macron’s wife admits her mind was ‘a mess’ when she dated her high school aged ex-pupil
Source: foxnews.com 11/19/23 French President Emmanuel Macron’s wife Brigitte Macron revealed her relationship anxieties from the...
Here’s one of their lists of concerns:
”
Use of information in public sex offender registries in the United States to carry out vigilante actions;
”
They can use it, but it’s insignificant to our case for some odd reason.
Here are some of the reason they’re citing AGAINST a public registry. Reasons we’ve all known about.
-Fears that many ex-offenders “go underground” to avoid the scrutiny and exposure of family members that comes from publication of their offences, address and other personal information. “This further inhibits effective law enforcement as police do not know the whereabouts of these offenders and are no longer able to monitor them to prevent possible reoffending”;
-Use of information in public sex offender registries in the United States to carry out vigilante actions;
-Lack of evidence that such databases have a significant impact on reducing the rate of sex offences, compared with treatment and reintegration programs that have led to reductions in recidivism, often at a lower cost.
That last point is the most important, in my opinion, as that certainly leads to a ton of negative effects, including greatly diluting law enforcement and increasing costs, while actually offering nearly zero safety to the community.
“It would also help federal departments carry out their mandates – for instance, providing Passport Canada with information that might result in revocation of a travel document, the notes say. In addition, the database could help foreign officials keep an eye on offenders who travel to their countries.”
This can only be done via a publicly-accessible database? Hmm, methinks I smell a rat (read: lie) there. And to claim that “foreign officials” are going to use the public database for “keep[ing] an eye on offenders” is ludicrous. Foreign entities are going to expect Canadian officials to alert them–perhaps via an “eh-ngel watch” system. 😉
Let’s see how many concerns they have that are already occurring here:
1. “Possible regional differences in the information available in the database due to varying practices in provinces and territories;” Check.
2. “Lack of new funding for the RCMP to create and operate the database;” Not initially, but now…check.
3. “Fears that many ex-offenders “go underground” to avoid the scrutiny and exposure of family members that comes from publication of their offences, address and other personal information. ‘This further inhibits effective law enforcement as police do not know the whereabouts of these offenders and are no longer able to monitor them to prevent possible reoffending'”; Double check.
4. “Use of information in public sex offender registries…to carry out vigilante actions;” Check.
5. “Lack of evidence that such databases have a significant impact on reducing the rate of sex offences, compared with treatment and reintegration programs that have led to reductions in recidivism, often at a lower cost.” Check.
What a surprise, 5 for 5. A couple years back, a forensic psychologist with whom I had a conversation said most of the best research and studies on sex offenders and offenses comes from Canada. I think it had to do with it all being handled federally so they equivalent info across the board. Anyway, my guess is our friends in the Great White North will rethink this, if for no other reason than not wanting to be too much like the U.S.!
–AJ
Their last concern of why not to do it:
“Lack of evidence that such databases have a significant impact on reducing the rate of sex offences, compared with treatment and reintegration programs that have led to reductions in recidivism, often at a lower cost.”
Since when does a politician care if something actually works? As long as it gets votes, they don’t care if it causes more victims, like the US registry actually does.
wow , common since thinking ,hmm , I am just trying to remember the last time our own gov has used any (Common Since)
Bonjour, I do not have a criminal record and officially, I am not on the registered sex offender registry. However, I am being tracked and followed by community vigilantes 24/7. They know where I am and they follow me everywhere, and I mean everywhere. I have secretly been implanted with a Micro-Chip. A GPS device has been put in my car. My telephone is wiretapped, my house is bugged. Everybody denies that this is happening! The idea is to put the blame on the suspect and accuse him of being delusional. This is called plausible deniability. It doesn’t work with me, because I have had the support of some politicians who know that I am telling the truth. There is obviously a Website or an App or somewhere that tells these self righteous misinformed vigilantes where I am. This is very bad policing and a complete waste of time and ressources. While they are concentrating on me, nobody is looking out for organized crime activities. This complete lack of organizing priorities might explain why Robert Pickton was able to get away with murdering dozens of young aboriginal women. Ninety five percent of crimes are committed by people who are not on any criminal registries. While the police are wasting their time on non-violent offenders who might have offended about fifty years ago, they are forgetting about criminals who are dangerous today. Tough on Crime is popular with politicians. The worst insult to a politician is to call him or her soft on crime. However, there is a third option. How about being smart on crime and relying on facts and research instead of anger, paranoia and revenge. It doesn’t help my case that a criminal has stolen my identity and that he has called at least 75 young girls since 1996. Some of these girls were as young as 13. I have never met most of those girls. I certainly have never called any one of them. U.S. Supreme Court Judges, at least some of them, are elected and therefore, they also must appear to be Tough on Crime. In a Supreme Court decision in Alaska in 2003, 6 judges against 3 voted that being place on the Sex Offender Registry for life did not constitute punishment. This has to be one of the most incredible decisions in the history of the United States, entirely based on false assumptions. Being implanted with a Micro-Chip, having a GPS device installed on your car, having your telephone wiretapped and your house bugged, receiving serious death threats, constant gang stalking, entrapment operations by the dozen, harassment, vandalism, street theater, smear campaigns, baiting, being ostracized by the community, for some it means never being able to find work and not even being able to find an apartment, and this is not punishment. Then what is it? I am one of the lucky ones. I have family support. The police have not been able to smear me to the point that I still have some community support. I have rebounded to some degree and I am trying to inform all these good people who mean well but are completely misinformed. Have a nice day.