PA: U.S. Supreme Court denies appeal of sex offender decision

The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear a challenge to a recent state court ruling that determined part of Pennsylvania’s sex offender registration law was unconstitutional. Full Article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Update on removing my info from the internet.

I have to say, there are many trolls out there, but there is one less as of this morning. I have to give MAJOR props to beenverified for their proactive moves and for beenverified reaching out to me by phone and email to understand my plight and their insistence on protecting me “reputation”. I went on a email battle with sexoffenersp&y (spelling on purpose to remove any SEO help, but you get it) out of Africa and this morning I recieved the following email from Beenverified

Dana, Feb 9, 10:47 AM EST:
Hi Michael,
I wanted to reach out and let you know that BeenVerified has ended our affiliate status with sexoffenders&y (SIC By Mike S.). BeenVerified information is no longer available on that site, and they no longer link to searches from our public records database.
We take people’s privacy concerns seriously, and want to offer professional and courteous support not only directly, but through the people and services we partner with as well.
Please let us know if there is anything else we can assist you with regarding BeenVerified.
Kind regards,
BeenVerified Customer Care

I asked this before but can’t find the reply, does anyone know of a good experienced ML attorney or attorneys that won’t rip SO’s off, I live near Philadelphia, someone mentioned
Samuel streton out of WestChester PA but he’s not listing as an ML lawyer.

SO Laws on Parallel with 1930 Reich Nazi Citizenship Laws
1935 Reich Citizenship Nazi Law Mandates that all Jews Must Register with the Government.
Any non compliance meant prison. All were photographed, fingerprinted, and biometric test done. A government issued ID card with JEW on it.
Hitler told the German citizens that registering the Jews was for their protection.
But soon other non Jewish people would have to register with the government. SOs are government registered Americans.
Megans Law has breached the constitution. The founders said if there was ever a breach of the constitution it would mean the end of America as you know it.
The danger Megans law poses to American democracy, it allows the government to take a person out of a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED ZONE and place them in, and subject to an abused GOVERNMENT CONTROL ZONE.
Under Megans law RCs have lost Five constitutional right and now are a subject of the government. They can now be arrest for not committing any crimes but for non compliance to government mandated rules and regulations.
94% of all new sex crimes are committed by first- time sex offenders.
DOJ statistics state that sex offenders have a 4% re-offence rate.
The average for other criminal categories is on a average of 50% and higher.
DOJ statistics documents that over 95% of child sex offenses occur by a person the child knows and trust not by an offender on the registry.
Jews in NAZI Germany had to carry with them at all times their Jewish registration card or risk being arrested.
The best way to show ownership of a car is to register it and then you are given title then you can show ownership of the car. To be a registered citizen means you have an owner which is the government, it can now do what ever it wants with the registered person.

Anyone notice the PSP page with SO numbers is not loading

We need to do a class action and sue the PSP

There is a distinction in the law between simple mistakes for witch PSP officials are immune and purposeful conduct that violates constitutional rights for which they are not immune.