CA: Keep violent sex offenders locked up (opinion by Jim Cooper, CA Assembly)

[sacbee.com]

Two years ago, California voters were promised that violent sex offenders wouldn’t be released from prison early if they passed Proposition 57, the sweeping ballot initiative allowing the early release of inmates convicted of non-serious and non-violent crimes.

But this month, a Superior Court judge tentatively ruled that sex offenders must be considered for early release under Prop. 57. If the ruling is made final, more than half of the 20,000 inmates now serving time for violent sex offenses could be back on the street.

That was the hidden flaw in Prop. 57. While it promised to keep violent offenders in prison, the list of crimes considered violent under California law is remarkably short. The list doesn’t include raping an unconscious person, or pimping a child, or beating a spouse. Clearly, few voters knew this.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

From what I have learned going through the Justice System, the DA typically pumps up the charges considerably. A consensual relationship with a teen is plea bargained into kidnapping and rape by force. Therefore you cannot be sure incarcerated violent felons were ever actually violent.
In my case, there was no intercourse, but the DA threw in one count of 289j – penetration with foreign object of victim under age 14. Sounds terrible, but it was his finger in me one time, (which was my fault and inappropriate I agree).
It was modified to 289i in court, since the victim stated he was a sophomore at the time, but the Court Clerk accidentally left it on my record as 289j and there it stayed during my entire incarceration. Any j sex offense felony is automatically considered violent. In the Women’s prison, inmates beat up anyone whose crime is against a child, so I kept quiet about it and had the charge corrected after I was out.

The assumption in this op-ed is that ALL “sex offenders” are in for sexually violent offenses and are “violent sexual predators.” Sounds like someone wants to sway public opinion so he can be re-elected this year.

Felony hate crimes, assault with a deadly weapon and drive-by shootings may be violent, but they are not sex crimes. They might as well make EVERY crime punishable with lifetime registration.

Sick puppies.

….

Never trust a politician. Even the “good” ones always manage to harm. Can anyone name a truely decent politician??

Great work Janice on the prop 57 case. Can you please tell us when is the ruling considered final? Can the inmatrs file a 602 now? What are the exact steps moving forward on this ruling.

Thanks for all your help

I’d like Jim Cooper to lose his seat.
He’s a craven manipulator of the reptilian parts of the human brain.
Cooper should not be in office.