WA: Bill to Protect Minor-Aged College Students From Sex Offenders Considered in State House

A bill under consideration by the state House of Representatives has been introduced in an effort to protect minor-aged college students, such as those in Running Start, from level three sex offenders. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Barring someone from an adult level education in what is almost entirely an adult facility. Yeah, this’ll go over well. Let’s ban RC’s from liquor stores and gas stations since they sell candy there.

As the bill is written, the college “may” restrict or prohibit a Level III registrant student, but does not require it. It also authorizes the college to let any student know of the registrant’s Level III status, which they are not allowed to do right now. This is just another step toward publishing all registrants in the state, and eventually adding presence restrictions, all in the name or protecting the public. What college will want to risk not notifying everyone of a registrant’s presence or restricting them as much as they can?

This is truly the silly season. When the legislatures is in session, tax payers hold on to your wallet, registered sex offenders go hide in the closet, and everyone be prepared to hear the phrase “but what about the children” a thousand times over the next 60 days. Jesus, please save us from your followers!

Wow, an RC who wants to better himself by going to college may not be able to if this bill passes. If the RC is already on a public registry that’s all everyone else needs to know (if there really is a need anyway). If not on a public registry, then he shouldn’t be called out to or by anyone.

Someone needs to challenge that because they need to have individual assessments of the people they’re trying to prevent from getting on campus to ensure they truly are an issue to be on campus with.

I just sent this email out to joyce.mcdonald@leg.wa.gov

Dear Representative Joyce McDonald,

I read the post by The Chronicle at http://www.chronline.com/crime/bill-to-protect-minor-aged-college-students-from-sex-offenders/article_3a067336-06d5-11e8-82c7-e391d92e775e.html

Do you know that the recidivism rate for sex offenders is lower than most crimes? It is around 5% nation wide. There’s a great research paper by Derek Logue about recidivism rates at
His entire research paper can be found at http://www.oncefallen.com/Recidivism101.html

This sex offender going to college only wants to better himself by getting a college degree and you support a bill that will punish him even further which leads to sex offenders jobless, penniless and often homeless. Would you rather have sex offenders in a stable place of residency or homeless where law enforcement have a much harder time keeping track of his whereabouts?

Please don’t let the MYTH of a “frightening and high” recidivism rate drive you to introduce bills which DO NOTHING TO PROTECT CHILDREN. 95% of new sex crimes are committed by family members, close friends, and people in authoritative positions like teachers. This whole sex offender registry started out to be ONLY A LAW ENFORCEMENT AID and was never meant to be for public access. And nowadays, law enforcement don’t even use the registry to find suspects of new crimes because again, 95% are NOT committed by people who have already committed one offense.

There are plenty of facts available if you truly want to protect children but creating hysteria and emotional judgement doesn’t work.

(my name)

Why are minors, speak children, in College? My property taxes pay for their Elementary, Middle and High Schools. Why?

Oh, come on! Why don’t you just put everyone in a plexiglass bubble.

Also worth mentioning that those minors aren’t required to take those college classes and if parents aren’t comfortable, they can choose not to send their kids there. Or have the instructors go to the high schools to teach them in a separate class.

And so it begins. The rush to ban the last place available for registrants to actually participate in any kind of normal activity…. It will be a rush all across the country as as other states get wind of this to ban all RCs from any kind of public education….

Comments on this bill can also be sent in via here:


Currently, it is sitting in the High Ed Committee basket and can be followed here: