ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (11/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

 

International

England: York trainspotter wrongly branded sex offender on Facebook

[bbc.com – 8/10/18]

A woman who branded a trainspotter as a sex offender in a Facebook post is being investigated by police.

The man, who has learning disabilities, was seen using binoculars in bushes near York railway station on Tuesday.

The woman reported him to police who established he was a keen trainspotter.

Police said she later uploaded a picture of the man on to Facebook and “wrongly branded him a sex offender”. They have launched a malicious communication investigation.

Yorkshire breaking news: Nine-year-old victim of seaside rock fall named; Man killed woman in ‘bizarre’ sex game

The Facebook post had attracted hundreds of abusive comments, North Yorkshire Police said.

“The incident has caused extreme distress to the man and his family,” a force spokesman said.

“Our advice to members of the public is to pause before you post and think of the potential consequences of uploading spurious and malicious messages and the devastating effect it can have on its victims.

Read more

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“While the member of the public was right to call the police about suspicious behaviour, uploading a photo of him and wrongly calling him a sex offender was extremely irresponsible.”

So it’s fine if the same thing happened to an actual RC? Because that’s how this quote comes off.

This indicates a creeping emergence into public consciousness of the validity of a relativistic metric for judging individual legitimacy based upon the conjectured status of the subject. There is now a two-track system in which things which “normal” people do continue to be allowable (although subject to scrutiny to determine status) but that when done by “sex offenders” are regarded as investigation-worthy and legally actionable. This phenomenon has escalated with a really alarming speed that we should not see as having yet arrived at its logical conclusion. Most people are trapped in the moment however and fail to see where all of this is likely to end-up.

Are binoculars illegal now?

Birdwatchers, beware.

The woman should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of some kind of crime and then posted on Facebook as a community nuisance for everyone to spot and ignore her…

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.