CA: Program lets victims confront offenders

[avpress.com – 7/9/19]

SACRAMENTO— California officials are experimenting with a new diversion program for criminals that includes allowing victims to directly confront their offenders.

The budget that took effect July 1 includes $5 million to fund the program for five years in a county with a history of high crime, although it has been tried elsewhere and is more frequently used with juvenile offenders.

The California program is for offenders of any age. It will pair victims and offenders before they are convicted, and offenders who complete the program can avoid having a criminal record.

Proponents said Monday that what are known as restorative justice programs can help survivors heal, while helping offenders avoid committing new crimes in part because they don’t face the stigma of a criminal conviction.

Those charged with murder and sex crimes are not eligible.

Read the whole article

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Seems to me that sex crimes would be ideal for this program. Why exempt them?

The precious gift of ratified right to open public jury trials ( no reps ). Precisely why the founders thought the process MUST BE ADHERED to. It services crucial purposes for the complainant and the people themselves. While plea bargains are expeditious, the efficiency costs have a causal counter productivity in citizens satisfaction. This the human need for such programs couched here. Like sex offender treatment it is a reactionary measure and while therefore useful, is symptomatic of a deeper systematic legal structure flaw.

Well, of course, it goes without saying:. “Those charged with murder and sex crimes are not eligible.”.
Domestic violence perpetrators…,
hit and run drunk drivers…..
Identity thieves…. all of them are just fine to participate in this program but God forbid you find someone charged with a CP crime participate!? Just imagine what might happen …… nothing! Or, far worse, what if the criimr victims actually ended up having some sympathy for the perpetrator and ended up feeling that the our legal/justice system’s punishment was egregiously excessive! God forbid they end up making more advocates for our side of this issue!

“Hey! The colored drinking fountain is over THERE!”

🤔 Hmmm….. If a murderer apologized to his victim, wouldn’t that apology fall on deaf ears? It could be a grave mistake. Gallows humor. 🙄