ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: September 21 – Phone meeting details

Emotional Support Group Meetings (Los Angeles, Sacramento, Phone)

Meetings / Events

ACSOL Meeting in San Diego on Saturday, August 17

ACSOL’s upcoming meeting in San Diego is as follows

Saturday, August 17
10 am
350 Cedar Street
Lecture Hall #2
San Diego, CA 92101

Registrants, friends and family and interested service providers are invited to attend these free meetings. There will be no law enforcement or media present in order to protect everyone’s privacy.

The meetings start at 10 am and last about 2-3 hours. Topics of conversation include information about ACSOL’s advocacy as well as current topics and pending legal action.

Please Show up, Stand up, and Speak up!

Hope to see you there!

Join the discussion

  1. Eric

    I’ll be there. I always look forward to them when they come to San Diego. Always very informative and I feel connected. I meet new friends, too.

  2. Carlos Flores

    My name is Carlos Flores and am making contact with your organization in hopes to stay informed on laws concerning 290 registration and SB384. I have a 288(c) conviction from almost 10 years ago (2009) which has a lifetime registration per plea agreement. I recently (June) filed for a “Proof of Service”, dismissal and was denied. I will appeal. I am also working to head off an effort to fight the SB 384 tier class/level I was matched with, Tier(3). My last request/comment is job placement as I need work immediately. I am going to make every effort to attend the ACSOL meeting is San Diego.
    looking forward to meeting members and staff.
    (gmail, caflores627@gmail.com.

    • Me. D

      @Carlos Flores – Is your 288c A felony or a misdemeanor? 288C is a wobbler offense so therefore if you were charged with a felony you can have it reduced via 17b down to a misdemeanor. Once you have successfully completed that reduction, you should be either a tier 1 or tier 2. And if you have a really good attorney and depending on what county reside in you could try and have the misdemeanor dismissed and expunged via 1203.4 that being said technically a 288C is not eligible for that reduction but if you have a good attorney sometimes you can get the judge to grant it. Good luck!

      • jesse

        We’ve been through this…. 288(c) is indeed a wobbler, but that is immaterial. 288(c) is Tier 3, either way.

        Read the current PC 290 as it is going into effect in 2021
        https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?chapter=5.5.&part=1.&lawCode=PEN&title=9.

        Reading from the top, 288(c) would be in Tier 1 as it is either a misdemeanor (Tier 1) OR a felony, but is not listed in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 (also Tier 1).

        “(1) (A) A tier one offender is subject to registration for a minimum of 10 years. A person is a tier one offender if the person is required to register for conviction of a misdemeanor described in subdivision (c), or for conviction of a felony described in subdivision (c) that was not a serious or violent felony as described in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7”

        So far so good.

        Tier 2 does not apply as it includes certain specified offenses and those listed in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7. 288(c) is not one of those. 288(a) is in Tier 2, as it is listed in 667.5.

        “(2) (A) A tier two offender is subject to registration for a minimum of 20 years. A person is a tier two offender if the person was convicted of an offense described in subdivision (c) that is also described in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7, Section 285, subdivision (g) or (h) of Section 286, subdivision (g) or (h) of Section 287 or former Section 288a, subdivision (b) of Section 289, or Section 647.6 if it is a second or subsequent conviction for that offense that was brought and tried separately.”

        So 288(c) would mean Tier 1 UNTIL subsection 3 which specifically lists 288(c). It makes no distinction between felony or misdemeanor.

        “(3) A tier three offender is subject to registration for life. A person is a tier three offender if any one of the following applies:
        (ix) Subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 288.”

        Additionally, Tier 1 explicitly excludes those listed in paragraph (3) / Tier 3

        “(1) (B) This paragraph does not apply to a person who is subject to registration pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3).”

        Meaning that 288(c) is Tier 3. Misdemeanor or Felony – don’t matter. Why? No idea.

        The whole tiered registry is a complete disaster. If a 62 year old raped a 5 year old before 2006 they are Tier 2. If a 26 year old hugged and kissed a 15 year old they are Tier 3.

        Same with Sen. Weiner’s current bill SB 145. A 28 year old (of any gender or sexual orientation) getting a bj from a 17 and 364 day old (of any gender or sexual orientation) gets mandatory registration, while a 25 year old (of any gender or sexual orientation) getting a bj from a 16 year and 1 day old (of any gender or sexual orientation) is subject to discretionary registration.

        Sen. Weiner may mean will, but what he has done is create new law that will be subject to equal protection litigation for years to come. Maybe it is not too late to go to law school?

        On that subject, one always needs to remember that a 26 year old hugging and kissing a 15 year old is a Tier 3 registrant, while someone torturing and killing a 2 year old is not registering at all.

        • Mr. D

          @Jesse – Yes we have been thru this before. And you’re not an attorney. And my attorney (the same one who managed to not only get it reduced but also dismissed and expunged via 1203.4) has reviewed carefully and states I’ll be a Tier 1. Another attorney I spoke with essentially concurs – 288c felony – Tier 2. 288c misdemeanor – Tier 2. No offense but I’ll go along with their insight.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

.