ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

National

NY: Motel’s Lawsuit Says Small Town’s Effort to Kick Out Sex Offenders Is Unconstitutional

[lawandcrime.com – 4/21/21]

A small city in Upstate New York is being sued by the owners of a local motel who say they should be allowed to offer their services to people formerly convicted of sex-related offenses.

Shree Granesh LLC, the owner of an EconoLodge on Main Street, filed a lawsuit against the Town of New Paltz over a recent ordinance which aims to limit (and ultimately reduce) the number of registered sex offenders who can reside at a certain commercial address.

In fact, it might be a bit more accurate to describe the local law as an effort designed specifically to reduce the number of registered sex offenders who can reside at one particular commercial address.

That is, the law in question was passed in direct response to fulsome local outrage at the EconoLodge over their highly-publicized decision to house seven medium-high level sex offenders late last year.

SUNY New Paltz students were sent notices of the recent move-ins from October through November 2020. Those notices led to a town meeting focused on the issue and ensuing local media coverage.

Read the full article

Related articles:

NY: An influx of Sex Offenders in New Paltz Causes Town to Tighten Reigns

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What I’d like to know is how many new sex offenses were committed by registrants housed at that hotel while they were staying there since this arrangement was made. Lack of reporting indicates none.

A business wanting to help people by giving them a place to live regardless of their past. More businesses should follow suit, but a not a lawsuit.

Huh? “…not a lawsuit”? So how is the motel supposed to give them a place to live if there’s a law preventing its doing so? The only recourse to achieve what you support is a lawsuit.

I meant more business should follow the motel’s actions by giving people places to live. Not filing a lawsuit to kick them out. Sorry sometimes my head is further along than my fingers.

If not a lawsuit, what exactly would you have them do?

“I don’t know why they’re more interested in sex offenders than tourists in their hotel,” New Paltz Supervisor Neal Bettez recently told local news outlet Hudson Valley One.

Who says they are? Think tourists flock to New Paltz in droves year round? There is tourist season and then the rest of the year where bills need to be paid with income. If there is not income coming in, businesses fail.

“[W]e made efforts to get them revenue without catering to sex offenders,” Deputy Supervisor Dan Torres added.

Dumbass, they are working with the state, not PFRs themselves initially. It is economics to begin with and the need to pay bills regardless of where the money comes from to do it.

They better start to think of settling with the business and let it go.

I guess they can’t imagine a business wanting to help people beyond just making a profit.

My mistake I thought registrants filed the lawsuit and not the owners of the motel. I mistakenly thought this was the post out of Montgomery County, Maryland.

Address530 Main St, New Paltz, NY 12561
Phone(845) 255-6200 give them a cal, i did ask why there are murders , thief’s, meth heads staying at their wonderful hotel.

This town’s actions is stupid, plain and simple. Is there a sign on Room 17 that states a SO is living there? Does a person online booking a room say “I’ll check the registry to make sure the hotel doesn’t have any registrants?” How did this even come up? Couldn’t somebody have said to the idiot who brought this up in a town meeting or something like that have said, “thank you for your information. We’ll look into it” and just ignore this NIMBY.

Also, in New York level one SOs don’t have to register. Whoever brought this up might be surrounded by SOs.

This makes me so frustrated. In fact, will be doing a video on this subject today. I’m worried that the ordinance by this New York town will become a trend for hotels across the country.

Its sort of a standard in California. Local cities have a max amount of registeants per a building.

13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.