CANADA: Supreme Court considers if mandatory listing on sex registry is constitutional

Source: cbc.ca 2/8/22

Edmonton lawyer asks top court to strike down sections of Canada’s sex offender laws

The fallout from a 2011 Edmonton sexual assault case has come before the Supreme Court of Canada. 

The country’s top court has been asked to consider striking down two sections of Canada’s sex offender laws as unconstitutional.

In 2011, the Stephen Harper government altered the Criminal Code so the names of sex offenders would automatically be placed on the sex offender registry.

The changes meant judges no longer had discretion on whether to submit names of sex offenders to the registry. It also mandated that anyone convicted of two sex offences or more would automatically be placed on the registry for life.

On Tuesday morning, appearing virtually in the Supreme Court, Edmonton defence lawyer Elvis Iginla asked the justices to replace mandatory placement with judicial discretion.

Crown argues for status quo
Alberta Crown prosecutor Jason Russell argued in favour of maintaining the current legislation. 

“The objective is to formulate a comprehensive database for law enforcement,” Russell said. “We just don’t have the tools to say which offender is going to re-offend.” 

Russell compared automatic listing on the registry to mandatory DNA orders for certain designated offences.

He acknowledged there’s a modest impact on the offender’s privacy rights, but argued that for most offenders the information remains unused in a highly secured database unless they are suspected of re-offending.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nice to see the Canadian Prosecutor admit the true primary intent of Canada’s Sex offender database was to assist law enforcement. Rather than the delusional of “to prevent crimes against the most vulnerable.”
Take note of the article’s author use of the word “comprehensive” in describing Canada’s database and the author’s use of the phrase “Crown argues for the status quo.” In computer science terms the status quo is referring to standard output of database = Null. Obviously, to we database developers and object oriented programmers comprehend authority’s misunderstanding of all aspects database are in reality distorted by an errant perception of usefulness of described necessary null.
While I can claim no expertise in Canadian law, computer science remains heterogeneous across all forms of government and social compact. Canadians, in fact, have no bill of rights for which authority must consider in weighing social benefit. We here in the U.S to have this constitutional default to consider.

Of course the prosecuter is arguing to kept the registry!

“The objective is to formulate a comprehensive database for law enforcement,” Russell said. “We just don’t have the tools to say which offender is going to re-offend.”

Mr. Russell – Do you have the tools to say who is going to offend initially let alone to think you know who is going to re-offend? I don’t believe you do. Guessing is the best you’ll do with data you think is right. I believe you’ll win some cases and lose some cases but don’t know which will be a win or a loss.