GA: US probation officer told Irish sex offender facing homelessness ‘to go and live in tent’

Source: 2/8/22

An Irish man who was jailed for trying to entice a child for indecent purposes was told to “go and live in a tent” by a probation officer in the United States, the Court of Appeal was told on Tuesday.

Martin ___(46) was caught in a police sting in the State of Georgia after he sent a nude selfie to an Internet chatroom user he believed was 13-year-old girl.

He later fled the US to Ireland while on probation, and has been fighting attempts to extradite him back across the Atlantic where he is wanted by the Chatham County Sheriff’s office in Georgia for an alleged breach of his bail conditions.

Mr Justice Paul Burns ruled at the High Court last October that there was no basis to refuse ___’s  surrender to US authorities and ordered his extradition.

At the Court of Appeal on Tuesday Shane Costelloe SC, for ____ , said the main reason his client left the US was because of Georgia’s strict sex offenders legislation. This restricts ___from living anywhere whilst on probation that is within 300 metres of areas where children might congregate.

These areas not only included schools and parks, but also shopping malls and bus stops and had effectively made him homeless, counsel explained.

Live in a tent
Mr Costello said this restriction had also resulted in Wall losing his job and had forced to him to live in a tent in a camp alongside other sex offenders on the outskirts of Savannah, Georgia.

He said his client has been the victim of violence as a result of his homelessness, and was forced to dig “his own latrine” in the earth because there were no toilet facilities at the camp.

When ____ first informed his probation officer that he faced being made homeless because the 300-metre rule was making it impossible for him to find anywhere to live, Mr Costelloe said his client was told to “go and live in a tent”.

“He ends up living in a tent in a homeless facility at the side of train tracks, where he experiences violence on a nightly basis,” counsel added.

In response, Patrick McGrath SC, for the Attorney General, said Mr Justice Burns had been entitled to reach his decision and that _____ was being returned to the US “to serve a sentence of imprisonment”.

“This is not a case where the appellant would be required to live in tent,” he said.

“The likely outcome in this case is that he would receive a period of detention.”

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sounds like something my PO would have said. What a jerk he was!! I basically told him that once I was off parole and knew he could not do a darn thing about it. Wow, that felt so good!!

Yes, what the man did was wrong. Yes he needs to be punished. Yes, he needs an opportunity to rehabilitate. No, I don’t think the victim is scarred for life for seeing a photo of a naked man. And no, forcing one into homelessness is not the answer. And yes I believe forcing one into homelessness would be considered a human rights violation. But then again, when has the US cared about it own human rights violations now or in its past history?

One of my former DCS officers:

On March 26, 2018, DCS Officer Joshua Luke threatened to shoot my dog (I have that documented), which I hadn’t even got yet. The dog was next door and I saved it from living in a cage.

Less than three months later, June 6, 2018, Luke did shoot a dog (not mine).

Was Luke predisposed to actually wanting to abuse his power and kill a dog?

Valdosta dog owner upset after local probation officer shoots his pet
I’ve had numerous supervision officers over the last years (20 years). Most have been respectful but some were outright aholes and wanting nothing more than to see me back behind bars. ALL can not be respected.

The PO should be “FORCED” to hit the slammer loose everything he has , and be told to do his prole in a tent for ex amount of time while on a “Forced” registry , and see what the cockroach has to say for his unethical actions