ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (11/19 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOL Conference Oct 1, 2022 


Namibia: A Sex Offender Register for Namibia? … Right Idea, Wrong Solution

Source: 5/19/22

IN 2017, hundreds of people gathered outside a house in Katutura after hearing reports that a man living there was abducting children and dismembering their bodies.

According to news reports, police deployed 20 police vehicles and a helicopter, and ended up having to use tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse the crowd. At least two people were injured in the chaos, and several police vehicles were damaged.

The rumours that led to the riot were entirely untrue.

This was not an isolated incident of vigilante action. There have been several recent reports just this year of crowds attacking or killing young men allegedly seen stealing cellphones.

Against this backdrop, the idea of making a list of sex offenders available to the public raises chilling possibilities of mob revenge.

The criminal records office of the Namibian Police already has an efficient and up-to-date system for certificates of conduct, which either confirm that the person in question has no criminal convictions in Namibia, or list that person’s convictions and the relevant date.

Given the existence of this database, it seems unnecessary duplication to construct a separate register for specific categories of crimes.

A sex offender register may infringe on constitutional rights of privacy and dignity, or constitute prohibited discrimination on the basis of social status.

Are sex offender registers effective?

No. There is no evidence that sex offender registers in other countries have reduced re-offending. Research from other countries highlights several flaws with these registers.

Revealing a sex offender’s identity can also have negative consequences for the offender’s family members who have done nothing wrong.


Instead of setting up a sex offender register, Namibia could expand on the existing system of police certificates and current rehabilitation programmes, to reduce re-offending without unleashing the possibility of mob ‘justice’.

Namibia should note the observation of a South African commentator that “a sex offender register does not prevent the commission of sexual offences. Sex offender policy issues may be implemented because they are popular, but that does not mean that they are efficient, effective or equitable. The state would do better to protect the public through legislation based on empirical evidence, while ensuring that citizens’ constitutional rights are not infringed on”.

*This article was made possible by support from the European Union and the Hanns Seidel Foundation. A copy of the article with references will be made available on the Legal Assistance Centre website at

Read the full article


Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What an amazingly enlightened position on public registries!

My dream is that someday our country accepts these ideas.

I am grateful to ACSOL for being a big part of that long-term process.

“This article was made in support from the european union” they’ve got it right.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x