Santa Cruz judge denies general ‘transient’ release to [former] “sexually violent predator”

SANTA CRUZ — The bid to release a twice-convicted rapist into the community without a set, permanent residence failed Tuesday.

Bonny Doon residents rallied at the County Courthouse in November to speak out against "sexually violent predator" Michael Cheek being housed on Wild Iris Lane. (Shmuel Thaler -- Santa Cruz Sentinel file)
Bonny Doon residents rallied at the county courthouse in November to speak out against “sexually violent predator” Michael Cheek being housed on Wild Iris Lane. (Shmuel Thaler — Santa Cruz Sentinel file) 

Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Syda Cogliati ruled against a “transient release” petition by 71-year-old Michael Cheek, designated by the state as a sexually violent offender. In November, Cogliati approved Cheek to move under supervised release into a rental home on rural Iris Lane in Bonny Doon, a decision the Santa Cruz County District Attorney’s Office later appealed to the California Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Final arguments in that appeal concluded Oct. 11 and a decision by the court is due within 90 days.

“As I view it, the transient release is always the backdrop to the ongoing and egregious due process violation that Mr. Cheek continues to suffer, 38 months after this court ordered him released with a designation that he is not a threat to society,” said defense attorney Stephen Prekoski, representing Cheek.

Prekoski filed the transient release petition July 25. In subsequent months, state authorities and attorneys in the case have met on several occasions to discuss potential alternative housing locations for Cheek — both in and out of Santa Cruz County. One location under consideration is in Butte County north of Sacramento, where Cheek has family members, officials said. The group also discussed potentially placing a trailer on property at the Rountree Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Facility in Watsonville and the state-owned Ben Lomond Fire Conservation Camp, according to court discussions Tuesday. The state-contracted Liberty Healthcare Corp., given responsibility to conduct site assessments on proposed housing sites, is actively searching out options in 12 counties, Santa Cruz County Assistant District Attorney Alex Byers said.

Continued at source

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments