OH: Want to Watch Porn in Ohio? New Bill Would Require Viewers to Show ID

Source: thedailybeast.com 1/16/24

A bipartisan group of lawmakers in Ohio have proposed a new bill that would require porn sites to verify the age of their users in the state in a bid to keep explicit online content out of the hands of minors. Senate Bill 212, as it’s known, mandates that would have would-be degenerates submit a photo of their state ID or provide their personal information to a third-party company before allowing them access to pornography. Companies that fail to comply could be slapped with stiff penalties. Asked by News 5 Cleveland if the new bill is “Orwellian,” Lt. Gov. Jon Husted (R), a backer of the bill, replied, “It’s not very Orwellian—it’s protecting kids from things we know harm them, that’s called responsible citizenry.” I

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Guess they’ve never heard of VPNs in Ohio (Or Louisiana).

All they want is another way to track people that view porn or anything else

I’m taking bets on how long this will survive in the courts if enacted! A week?

It’s a good thing with the right intentions.
We have laws that check ID for the sale of tobacco and liquor so that it’s not sold to minors.
You can’t go into a store that sells pornography and buy it unless you prove your age, so what’s the big deal.
You can try to rationalize it and say ‘They’ll just go somewhere else and watch it”, but this makes it harder.to do that.
I wouldn’t want my underage son or daughter watching pornography online.
How about you?? Y/N
( And don’t try to say that’s not the point, because it IS the point!)

“Pornhub’s parent company said that it had complied with a similar law in Louisiana to devastating results. “Since then, our traffic in Louisiana dropped approximately 80 percent….these people did not stop looking for porn. They just migrated to darker corners of the internet that don’t ask users to verify age, that don’t follow the law, that don’t take user safety seriously, and that often don’t even moderate content.”

The Pornhub spokesman just described the company! They don’t follow the law and moderate content, given that they’ve repeatedly been in hot water for posting CSAM content on their website. Pornhub just recently lost to a class action suit filed by a group of survivors. These so called “adult sites can be gateways into cp, especially when they have teen categories with pop ups that lead to illegal sites. I think it’s time these companies share some skin in the game, instead of only users subjected to draconian cp laws. I don’t know if this is the way to do it, but if a consumer did stumble onto some cp material via Pornhub, investigators will have their credit card number and payment to Pornhub as the middle-man. If I go down, they’re going down with me.

A point of this new law that concerns me is that they are outsourcing the ID checks to a third-party company.

What type of controls will there be on the third-party company releasing the data they’ll surely gather on who accesses porn sites? Seems like a system ready for abuse of the data, whether it be for marketing purposes, release to government, or some other nefarious purpose.

This wouldn’t even remotely hold up in court.

It’s not “responsible citizenry.” It’s totalitarianism. This is a parental issue, not a government one. I for one cringe at the thought of legislatures that conflate those issues or don’t know the difference between them.

 Lt. Gov. Jon Husted (R), a backer of the bill, replied, “It’s not very Orwellian[.]

Gee, thanks, dude, for only making it a little Orwellian. Kinda like being very pregnant versus a little bit pregnant…

In Brazil porn is broadcast on network TV after midnight. Parents send kids to the store to pick up wine and beer. National heroes get honored in Playboy foldouts first, then grace the cover of the Nation’s Constitution. Thank God American pledge-of-allegiancers don’t share their deranged ideologies and joy of life.

This attack on “porn” is bullshit most people didn’t need an id to vote multiple times in the 2020 election but these idiots are wanting to card people for what they consider porn genius because making sure only adults watch porn is more important than a fair election