CA: Committee Agrees SB 1128 Won’t Be Applied Retroactively

The California Assembly Public Safety Committee today voted in favor of Senate Bill 1128 (SB 1128) that would require individuals convicted of PC 261.5, unlawful intercourse, who are at least 10 years older than their alleged victim, to register.  During today’s hearing, however, the Committee agreed that the bill would not be applied to those previously convicted of this offense.  

According to a report given earlier this month during a meeting of the CA Sex Offender Management Board, the retroactive application of this bill could add up to 32,000 people the registry.

While we are disappointed that the Committee today approved Senate Bill 1128, we are pleased that the Committee agreed that the law would not be applied retroactively,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “ACSOL is committed to stopping passage of this bill during the next three steps of the legislative process.”

Because the Committee passed SB 1128 today, the bill will next be considered by the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee no later than August 15.  If the Appropriations Committee approves SB 1128, all members of the Assembly will vote on the bill no later than August 31.  The final step in the consideration of the bill is the Governor who has the right to veto SB 1128 no later than September 30.

ACSOL will notify members on this website regarding future opportunities to stop Senate Bill 1128,” stated Bellucci.  

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

That’s some good news. Making this retroactive didn’t make sense for what the tiered registry was trying to accomplish. It’s already messed up as it is without making it balloon by 30% overnight with people who have been living good lives for decades.

That is good news to those who it would affect.
Could that just bs and say that just to get it through?
Second, why would they not retro this bill but yet retro other crimes?
I’m just asking 🙂

Their verbal agreement is meaningless. Unless it is written into the bill it will be used retroactively. It always is when it comes to us. When it helps us its only effective going forward, when it hurts us its always retroactive.

Ten board members from ACSOL and its foundation as well as representatives from other organizations showed up at this hearing to voice our opposition to SB 1128. In fact, the number of people who spoke in opposition to this bill was at least the same number as those who supported SB 1128. ACSOL is following through on the issue of retroactivity discussed during the hearing and is drafting an amendment to SB 1128 that clearly states that the bill, if enacted into law, would not be applied retroactively. This language is necessary in order to protect up to 32,000 people who have previously been convicted of PC 261.5 from being added to the CA registry.

Now it’s time to jam the Supreme Court to reverse their decision on making Meagan law retroactive . Therefore making thousands of people Retroactively register and ruining their lives !!!!.

It is perfectly rational to presume that none of the people that are currently convicted of this are, but absolutely everyone that will be convicted should unquestionably be presumed to be. How…?

Let’s do some math? 32,000 previously convicted, let’s say the average length of time spent outside of prison is 10 years? That gives us, 320,000 “Predator years” over the last 10 calendar years. Assuming the group averages 1 new victim per “Predator year” giving us 320,000 “Perfect crimes” committed by this group over the last 10 years, Roughly 87 a day…everyday? Now extend this idea all the way back to the person that has been out of prison for the longest!

Also, we must also continue to presume that predators get craftier, and craftier with age! Older predators don’t stop committing crimes, they just get caught far less often. Oh and female predators always about twice as crafty as male, which is why they get caught about half as often.

So, that’s why it is absurd to think that any of the previously convicted are, but that does not interfere with the presumption that all newly convicted will be…how???

Extra Credit: Try to calculate the astronomically large number of “Perfect crimes” CA 311’s are presumed to have committed over the last 20 years. What are the odds we’re all comic book supervillains of Dr. Doom like levels? 😁