Source: reason.com 9/26/24 The N.J. intermediate appellate court held such publication wasn’t protected by the First Amendment law; the state high court just agreed to reconsider that. The question presented is, Is Daniel’s Law, N.J.S.A. 56:8-166.1 and N.J.S.A. 2C:20-31.1, which prohibits disclosing the home addresses of certain public officials, including judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement personnel, unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff? Here’s an excerpt of the lower court opinion, Kratovil v. City of New Brunswick: Read the full article
Read MoreMonday, December 23, 2024
Recent posts
- TX: HB 1401 would require any educator convicted of such offenses to register as a sex offender
- ACSOL Online Meeting January 18, 2025
- Vigilantism and the Sex Offender Registry
- CA Survey: Are you affected by PC 4571 (stay away from people in custody)?
- U.S. Sentencing Commission Seeks Comment on Proposals to Promote Public Safety and Simplify Federal Sentencing
