AZ: Arizona to launch Sex Offender Management Board to tackle treatment, reform

Source: azfamily.com 8/19/25

PHOENIX (AZFamily) — A recently passed law is funding Arizona’s first-ever Sex Offender Management Board, which is aimed at getting justice for victims and preventing cases in the future.

The board will be made up of 25 people who are experts on sexual abuse and deviancy. It will include psychologists, law enforcement officials, and victims’ rights representatives. They will make legislative recommendations regarding sentencing and treatment of sexual offenders.

It will work to develop statewide standards and procedures to assess and supervise both kids and adults who have committed sex crimes.

“After the stories of sexual abuse from the headlines, the supervision of those who committed sex crimes should not be a mystery,” said Beth Goulden, a retired law enforcement official.

Goulden believes the board will make a big difference. “Sex offenses, too often, happen …

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I hope the AZ sibling org to ACSOL gets in on this as a member to advise and guide these folks where LE shouldn’t have a seat at the table since they enforce the law they are sworn to uphold by the legislature.

LE is a tool, not a consideration piece in the equation, especially since they are a part of those who abuse their power in positions of trust via their own sex crimes. Their involvement is a fox guarding the hen house and would encourage sweet deals for their own while screwing others harder than LE could get.

Last edited 2 months ago by TS

This board’s composition and mandate present a clear conflict of interest. By empowering law enforcement, prosecutors, and affiliated psychologists to both define deviance and recommend sentencing policy, Arizona collapses the boundary between adjudicator and enforcer. Such entanglement violates foundational principles of impartial adjudication under the Fourteenth Amendment and contravenes federal standards for administrative fairness, including those outlined in 5 U.S.C. § 554. The absence of registrant representation or independent oversight renders the board structurally biased, incapable of delivering neutral assessments or evidence-based rehabilitation. When those with vested punitive interests are tasked with determining treatment eligibility, the result is not reform—it is a closed circuit of control masquerading as care. This is not a therapeutic panel; it is a carceral tribunal cloaked in clinical language.

Disclaimer: This statement is offered as public commentary and constitutional critique. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be construed as a substitute for individualized counsel. All references to statutory and administrative frameworks are for educational and advocacy purposes only. The author is not affiliated with the Arizona Sex Offense Management Board and does not endorse its composition, mandate, or procedures. Any resemblance to specific individuals or institutions is incidental and not intended to defame or misrepresent. This commentary is protected under the First Amendment as political speech and public oversight of government action.

Victims rights advocates have no place on such a committee. All they are interested in is revenge.

What needs to be done is get rid of the lifetime registration that has no avenue to get off of it.

Okay let’s break this down..

Sex Offense Management Board………….
And in the same sentence is,…… Justice for victims.

Can you tell me how this is going to play out? Not go
od!!