WI: Department of Corrections sex offender registry specialist admits registries are useless

Source: leadertelegram.com 6/30/26

CHIPPEWA FALLS — A Chippewa Falls committee recommended approval of a plan Tuesday that would expand the perimeter on where registered sex offenders cannot reside in city limits.

The Chippewa Falls Public Safety Committee voted unanimously to recommend the revised six-page ordinance, which calls for a residency ban within …

There is no evidence that residency restrictions protect children,” Meister told the committee last month. “Most sexual assaults are committed where the victim knows the perpetrator. The stranger assaults are rare. Ordinances can create that false sense of security.”

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments

Imagine that! An expert about the registry from the department of corrections openly admits that residency restrictions do nothing, but the council moves ahead.
It’s not the facts that matter at this council.
That really grieves me!!

This is when this forum gets together to blast the council from afar. You share with them how embarrassing they look to even seriously consider this matter when the data which was given to them disputes and disproves their line of thought.

This isn’t surprising—the registry represents an attempt to bypass the US criminal justice system so that elected politicians can directly dole out punishment without facing checks and balances. It’s the mark of an elected leader who doesn’t respect the constitution and the balance of powers. As imperfect as the US criminal justice system is, at least within it there are trained and experienced professionals who have some understanding of punishment and have some duty of care. The Sheriffs of Nottingham who push registry hysteria and force PFRs from their homes and into strip mall parking lots have no expertise and face no repercussions when PFRs suffer or die on their watch. People who run prisons and parole systems do. The original sin of the registry was the judiciary not immediately clocking it as a punishment and either throwing it away or at least bringing it under the purview of the criminal justice system so it could be properly administered. America might be the only country where judges happily relinquish their powers. Thank God we are finally seeing some sanity, but it’s painfully slow.

A little over 10 years ago, I attended an orientation for newbies at the beginning of my confinement at Jackson Correctional in Black River Falls. A probation specialist for the Wisconsin DOC spoke at the event, and I clearly remember him saying that we over incarcerate people and he would be perfectly fine if individuals served their sentence outside of prison on ankle bracelets. At that moment, I actually thought the Wisconsin DOC was enlightened and might be easy to work with. Boy, was I wrong! Never did I imagine that they would be such an evil organization. For one, that ‘reformist’ minded probation specialist serviced an area in small town & rural northern Wisconsin, so he likely didn’t have urban people in mind. Most importantly, reforms regarding sex crimes don’t count, because those ankle bracelets never come off in many cases–including for just looking at pictures on a computer.

Why have experts when city councils know best? Wisconsin’s city councils must eat cow pies, drink raw milk, and breath cow dung.

Those that rubber stamp all these new laws and restrictons wanting to “protect” children are actually dumber than children.

Bunch of adults who have their fingers in the their ears because they can’t handle the truth. If you can’t face reality get out of politics and get a job as a farmhand because one enjoys society as a sty. Wisconsin American’s Dumbazz State where Madison is the northern version of Tallahassee.