NJ: Spurred by rape victim, bill says sex offenders shouldn’t get child custody

In March, Lakewood resident Jackie Anselmo started a campaign to restrict parental custody rights of convicted sex offenders.

Less than six months later, a bill to that effect has been introduced in the New Jersey Assembly.

Bill A-5160, which is sponsored by Assemblyman Sean T. Kean, R-Ocean, would amend existing law to bar “custody of and visitation rights to any child for a person convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under age 13.” Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This story was highlighted earlier this year and she was lambasted for it. Pushing her own agenda and got someone who needed political clout in an upcoming election a topic they felt they could ride to victory. One size does not fit all and a broad brush stroke won’t work.

Keep in mind that most registrants in New Jersey are on lifetime parole and have fewer options to fight any of these new laws. Most new registrants who are NOT on lifetime parole are those who moved in from out of state.

Yes, we need more blanket laws and no individual evaluation.

Good thing she only wants those with specific convictions to be automatically barred. I’m glad my alcoholic step-father who constantly beat my brother and mother and nearly killed her on more than one occasions is not on the list to be barred from future and current custody. That would’ve been a real travesty. I’m glad my county had no issues granting him unsupervised visitations with my brother despite all the evidence, and that the cop was able to get passed my brothers tears of fear when he told my mother SHE would be the one to go to jail if she didn’t show up with my brother.

Alcohol & violence was in my home too though not constant it was undeniable and brutally, brutally painful to my brother, sister and myself. The heartache is brutal. But since there was no sex offense. . .