CA: Bill to accelerate sex offender registry notifications clears Riverside assembly

Admin

A Riverside County lawmaker’s bill to require prisons, county jails, mental institutions and other facilities to hasten alerts to the California Department of Justice regarding the release of registered sex offenders was unanimously approved today by the Assembly. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Why is everything a “loophole”?

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Since we are a sanctuary state the exception would be if you are a illegal alien.

0
Reply

Meh. Doesn’t seem like this will effect RC’s in any way (thankfully), but will certainly cost the state, counties, and cities more money. Election season is the worst as are politicians that abuse their power this way for nothing more than votes under completely false pretense.

0
Reply

Unless I’m missing something it’s a waste of effort with either 90 days or the 15 days this bill requires. We have 5 days to register and I am going to guess, when we register, they (law enforcement) kinda get the idea that we are there and don’t really need the DOJ to tell them.

I must be missing something.

0
Reply

I just added 3 comments on the article. Please add yours.

0
Reply

“Prohibited from loitering”?

Since when?

0
Reply
View Replies (4)

Sorry AO but that is not exactly correct. I just visited these sites and they appear to be in effect. Whether they are enforcing them or if they have all been repealed is another question. As far as I can tell they are still ordinances that have not been repealed and this was just a quick look.
For clarification, and proper citations of some of the 482 different municipality codes in California alone (It is not reasonable to expect Plaintiff to cite every California local ordinance) see examples: Apple Valley Chapter 11.54.010 http://www.applevalley.org/government/municipal-code/title-11-peace-morals-and-safety#Chapter%2054 [visited on April 13, 2108]; Arcadia Municipal Code Chapter 9.4 of Article IV ORDINANCE NO. 2318 https://library.municode.com/ca/arcadia/ordinances/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=670014 [visited on April 13, 2108]; Bellflower Municipal Code 9.40.010 et seq. https://qcode.us/codes/bellflower/ [visited on April 13, 2108]; Orange Municipal Code Chapter 9.10 Ordinance Nom. 03-14 https://library.municode.com/ca/orange/ordinances/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=669862 [visited on April 13, 2108]

0
Reply
View Replies (2)