OH: Landlord with convicted rapist as tenant tests nationwide eviction moratorium

[beaconjournal.com – 11/4/20]

When Norton resident Charles Fowler discovered he had a Barberton tenant with a criminal record that included rape living at one of his rental properties, he knew he had a problem.

For one, there was a nationwide moratorium on evictions. The ban was first passed by Congress earlier this year as a response to rising unemployment during the coronavirus pandemic. That ban expired, but the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an order extending it until Dec. 31.

..

He contacted U.S. Rep. Anthony Gonzalez’s office, where he hit a wall. Fowler was told by a staffer that because of the CDC order, there was nothing the lawmaker could do.

The letter to the school district, however, paid off. The district’s attorney contacted Barberton Law Director Lisa Miller, he said.

Miller said that she filed a notice with the court in the case based on an exception to the CDC’s moratorium for health and safety reasons. The court reactivated the case and on Oct. 27, Fowler got his hearing.

Miller praised Fowler, calling him a conscientious landlord.

“He cares for his properties and the people who live there,” she said.

On Oct. 28, a magistrate ruled in his favor. Fowler said he’s hoping the eviction will be completed this week.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Even though the CDC order bans evictions, this landlord finds an exception.

It’s ridiculous how it says in the article he cares for the people who are his tenants and neighbors. He obviously didn’t take care of that tenant who would have a particularly hard time finding housing.
I wonder if he’s bothered to search public records on everyone around to make sure there are only completely arrest and offense free individuals within a certain radius of him? Of course he doesn’t. He just wants accolades by picking on the underdog who is on the easily searched registry so he can get his 15 min of fame.

When I was released from prison it was because of a landlord ACCEPTING my application to live at one of his properties. He owned many properties – single family houses and rooming houses. To boot he was a devout Christian. He and his wife were very religious and all of their seven children were adopted. They ranged at the time from 9 to 17. All of the children were from different races, etc.

This landlord and his wife strongly believed in second chances. He highly preferred to rent to S#x Offenders because they so much appreciated the fact that he and his wife treated them with kindness and compassion and that the residents (me being one of them a reg SO) took such good care of his units that we lived in. We highly respected him and his wife.

He was a member of a “landlord group” and at his meetings other members (other landlords) would ask him why in the world he would rent to SOs. He made it quite clear to those who asked – “Everyone, no matter who they are, deserve a second chance!”.

My boss and his wife (the part time office job I work at now) also are Christians and also believe in second chances. They know of my background but consider me one of their best employees. They have a lot of respect for me as a “person”. I am in a management position also with this company.

I own my own home now so I don’t have to worry about a landlord. Some of my neighbors snub me but one of them could care less and he tells the other neighbors basically when they start to bash me in front of him to leave me alone and mind their own business because I am not bothering anyone and stay to myself.

Really wish there was a comment section on this article. There are a lot of holes in this story that I for one would like to see filled.

First, the reporter didn’t name the targeted registrant. Pretty unusual for a story like this to not name the “sex offender” and rehash the crime that led to his registration requirement.

Second, they pointed out that he was “under indictment” for FTR – wouldn’t there be a warrant out for him then? Wouldn’t LE be asking for “anyone with information…” in such a story? Wouldn’t that have come up when they arrested the wife on another matter?

Third, why bother with eviction? Why not report the tenant to the sheriff’s office and have him popped for either FTR or residence violation? Pretty sure a criminal statute (state or federal) overrides a CDC regulation.

And finally, how long had the “problem tenant” lived there before this (supposed) discovery, and how many incidents occurred during that time? He complains that the rent payments stopped after he served an eviction notice (duh), but not ONE SINGLE WORD about any suspicious activity he personally saw about this guy to make him seem a CURRENT threat, nor anything about terrified neighbors.

The whole story stinks. If I had to guess, this landlord wanted to evict someone for whatever reason and made up the the sex offender part to elicit sympathy from whoever he complained to, including the reporter who has shown yet another reason to doubt that there is anything resembling journalistic integrity in the media today.

If anyone has Facebook, please copy/paste the above onto this paper’s page. I intend to wirte to the story’s author, but I’m not holding my breath waiting for a response.

The tenant would have been better positioned to launch defense if he was in compliance with the law (registration). On another note the general public has latched onto this misnomer of stranger danger and that residency restrictions offer protection. We all know (including law enforcement) that crime is typically perpetrated against someone in their family, a significant other or someone in their social circle.

I am curious to know how long the tenant has lived there, if he has always paid his rent on time, has never caused any problems there, etc., because if he was a good tenant I think he has a good leg to stand on with a lawsuit. To evict someone solely on the grounds of being a registered citizen violates so many civil rights.

War is hell as someone once said. Well than what is life or is just luck to pass the standards of life without hassles in life or do we all seem to mind our own business. So what if landlord finds out you raped someone or do we rape in war with killing the enemy or are we all still wrestling with flesh and blood?

Is this landlord raping his position in this eviction ordeal or the government or who is created equal when those with these inducements via the internet invade on another. Oh “its my job to protect and serve as they say”. So who is pumping the press in this wine vat of emotion or priming the pump in this outcast of others. Sure we can all talk about taking care of business but who’s business is it to overthrow others. Punishment can be used for good or bad and many times overrated and somewhat vain or who is seeking their own vain glory?

Rape can take on many different view’s and forms. Working things out in this landlord issue is the best remedy as no one wants to hold a black face to another or should we all say “Erase the hate” in many of these callous ordeals. Sure we all have responsiblities but we are all different and many can go to far such as ths landlord wanting to boot someone out of a home or an apartment or living area.

So were does segration come into play or does pandemic say much in all this. Should people only have a Bill Gates degree to go on the internet to understand all about human behavior or how to treat one’s fellow man or who’s trying to get over on the other person… or does the one that is a sex offender look at the degree easy way out of a situation.

Isn’t that how protests start.

This landlord is letting fear dictate life. For the safety of his tenants? This citizen on the registry IS one of his tenants! Just outrageous to say the least. so sorry this kind of B.S. keeps happening

Sex offenders who dont own property in America are eazy targets for LE and are most likely to be sent to prison for violating their sex offender registration conditions.
Because of IML its literally impossible to stay at one job for along time same with renting apartments all it takes is one noise Neighbor to start gossiping and pointing their finger and complaining to the office for you being at the pool with your kids or BBQ on the public grill’s by the play area while your kids are playing.
This is the type of stuff sex offenders go through everyday it literally destroyes marriages separates kids from their parents and forces sex offenders to go under ground and become homeless.
The biggest victims of IML is the teenage sex offenders the ones still in high school who are placed on the registry before they even learned how to drive their whole adult life is over before it even started being a sex offender is all they will know and without being able to obtain a stable source of income at such a young age alot of them won’t be abole handle the pressure snd fall in into depression loneliness and hopelessness and end up committing suicide others turn to a life of crime to survive and end up doing hard time.

Good luck

Not sure if the conviction pre-dates the lease, but if so the landlord should not have been surprised by his tenant’s conviction. Just me, but I think that if a landlord doesn’t check on these things before leasing the apartment he should be prohibited from evicting someone after the fact.

When I was putting together my release plan for a parole hearing, securing housing was a problem. We finally came up with a gutsy plan – my mother worked with my attorney and together they placed an ad in the local paper which read in part, “Sex offender about to be released from prison seeks country house/apartment to rent…” Interested parties were directed to contact my attorney.

Believe it or not, there were a few responses. If a landlord responded it was clear my status didn’t scare them off. If they were scared off, they didn’t respond. I was determined to prevent the situation outlined in this article, and luckily it worked.

It’s apparent this crotchety old landlord is looking for any excuse possible to evict those unable to pay their rent. He leaves out the fact that in the eviction moratorium also includes relief to landlords.
As for the registrant and his wife, they don’t sound like winners. The wife was busted for an outstanding warranty on a stolen vehicle?
The guy had an FTR in another state?
Aye yaye yaye. What a mess.