ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (07/23 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOL Conference Oct 1, 2022 



California Approves Parolee Voting, Rejects Additional Violent Felonies (Prop 17 & 20)

Voters in the state of California approved voting by parolees and rejected a proposed significant increase in the number of violent felonies in yesterday’s election. That is, voters approved Proposition 17, by a margin of 59 percent to 41 percent, that will allow individuals on parole to vote in future elections. And voters rejected Proposition 20, by a margin of 62 percent to 38 percent, that would have increased the number of violent felonies from 27 to 51.

“ACSOL thanks everyone who followed its recommendations by voting in favor of parolee voting and in opposition to increasing the number of violent felonies,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “The voting results on these two ballot propositions is proof that our voices have been heard, that we can make a difference.”

In addition to ACSOL, support for Proposition 17 included the League of Women Voters, ACLU and Californians for Safety and Justice. The primary supporters for Proposition 20 included several law enforcement organizations such as the California Police Chiefs Association, Crime Victims United and the Contra Costa County District Attorney.

“Although the supporters of Proposition 20 spent considerably more money trying to pass that ballot initiative, justice ultimately prevailed in its defeat,” stated Bellucci. “If Proposition 20 had passed, more people, including registrants, would be sent to prison for longer periods of time.”

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’m glad this worked out. Though I have to say I’m not sure where Prop 20 put its money? I dont think I’ve seen a single ad or anything on it. Were it not for this forum, I don’t think I wouldve known about it outside of the ballot form.

This is wonderful news, and proof that when we work together to fight for issues, we CAN make a big impact! Thanks to all of you who took action on these propositions. We can savor these victories and remember them as we fight in future issues.

And had prop 20 passed it would’ve made possession of child abuse imagery a violent felony meaning anybody convicted of that would’ve had to serve 85% of their sentence before getting out. This brought to you by the California GOP everyone. Those people are absolutely out of their minds.

Congratulations California on your vote is n Proposition 17,20.
Sounds like ACSOL approves of the outcome.

On the other hand, in terms of your state’s 50 presidential delegates, the most by far of the states, has opted for the head cheerleader for: Whetterling Act, OMNIBUS94, Megans laws, the Sandusky rules, IML, Sec 230, Three strikes, and unfettered emigration. Good luck with respect to that. I’ve no doubt the Don’s taking on of China & big tech in Silicon City paved the way for his loss as each are major underlying California industries & jobs on the unionized ports and docks. His stance on the Southern border must have rubbed too many Californians wrong, and impacted Californian families in ways not experienced here in the Northern Mid West. I blame the Don’s own tactless big mouth. He was his own undoing on that score. I felt every bit as astonished when Jimmy Carter was rejected for his second term. Carter spent most of the rest of his days building habitat for humanity. I’ll surmise the Don wont be doing that or anything near as noble. Having said all that California has in my estimation almost singlehandedly put a senile 70 something other into the presidency. Naturally the deepstate and their big tech surveillance saints will capitalize on Joe bidens mental slippage similar to Ron Regan’s second term. Naturally too all the FISA abuse by gmen like Comey, Clapper and Brennan will get swept away like it never happened.

California the gold rush state or the white wash state. Must be a lot of folks on the registry out their. Sure voting rights are good if their is someone worthy to vote for or something worthy to vote for. Now I don’t vote and I’m sure their are many in America that don’t and I’m sure we all have differences of opinion.

Well this whole sex registry seems to be the topping on the cake or who assumes their role in this tug of war effort or who’s playing who in this type of debauchery in this cheap way in many of these ordeals. One wonder who’s bearing false wittness.

Censorship, just like Google, and all bathed in claims in self defense.

Thank you to everyone who voted and got out the vote! Senator Wiener, sponsor of SB-145, was also re-elected, another victory for registrants and LGBT Californians.

This is clear evidence that the public has figured it out. We are tired of being silenced, intimidated and controlled. There are so many families that include someone that has been caught up in the the meat grinder called the criminal justice system.

Keeping people incarcerated may not touch people’s emotions; yet it reaches far into their pockets and the overall economy. If the government and law enforcement want people to be moral they should practice what they preach. Americans need to hold government accountable election year or not.

@ Brandon and many on here. So tell us what is practice what you preach. Seems to me everyone is practicing what they preached on here or would we be involved in any of this registry scheme. I was intune that the registry was to prevent something from occuring or is it a prelude of whats next. i.e psychoanaylis and mind bending therspy and other effects in this human ordeal.

Prevent what or practice what? Prevent a man or woman from being a child molester or to go on some webpage and take random pock shots to anyone that would fall under the wheel. when they (law enforcement) are the main ones inducing and laying this burden upon another for their somewhat gainful pride and joy in much of this game of chance, or are they really protecting someone or really preventing or who assumes the worse case scenario in these ordeals. Even incarcaration in much of this registry, is it protecting or preventing in much of this form of punishment. Talk about a shake down of the human mind.

Haven’t many of us on here been jaded or dupes by this government type of practice of what you preach or who got the best out of many in these worse case scenario’s. Now theirs your double standard if you want to call something black and white. At times we all should say that but who looks the other way. Should we all say government is just as guilty in much of factors in many of these vain encounters by these measures of inducement. I would really like to hear some good comments on this from man and females. Are many in authority playing some snake in the grass game or should one call it a mousetrap or how to entrap by sexual means with a callous prevention program.

To the politicians and LEOs that want to turn California into a penal colony, the voter have spoken loud and clear, and their response is………..🖕🏽!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x