Please join ACSOL Executive Director and civil rights attorney Janice Bellucci as well as ACSOL President and criminal defense attorney Chance Oberstein for our next phone meeting. The meeting will be held on Saturday, June 12, beginning at 10 a.m. Pacific time and will last at least two hours.
This meeting will be recorded and then posted as an audio recording within 24 hours. A link to the recording will be at the top of our pages.
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055
Conference Code: 983459
If you have problems calling this phone number, ask your phone company why. Companies like T-Mobile may block conference call numbers or charge a small fee.
Discussion topics will include:
- pending CDCR regulations for CA inmates
- the California Tiered Registry (now effective)
- proposed SORNA regulations
- in-person registration during the COVID-19 pandemic
- residency restrictions
- overseas and domestic travel
- other current topics and pending legal action throughout the nation.
Please Show Up, Stand Up and Speak Up!
To ask a question, press 5*
See a list of all our recordings
See a schedule of our meetings for this year
Hi, Janice,
With California reverting back to its “normal” community affairs and operations on June 15 (at least so it’s claimed), is there a good chance of resuming in-person group support any time soon?
I’m a bit confused I’m not quite sure if I’m on the page of this issue but I have an attorney who is going to investigate my situation relating to requirements of SOT/ registration she informed me that based on what she now believes to understand she is optimistic at getting me back into court and getting the registration off me she implied that I am not on Megan’s law nor any case history whatsoever of I’m seeking advice on these matters and case law that may be relevant
When are we going to get Judges that will stand up and declarer these laws unconstitutional? some of us living under socialism and most are not and people are crying about wearing masts. get on the offender list and then you can really cry or restrictions to some things. Why are the Judges supporting white supremist laws? The only two subjects that get any kind of attention are gun control and sex offender laws which seem to be the way to get elected these days to have voted yes on anyone of these subjects. U dont have to break any laws in Washington State to get denied to get off the list, all you need is hear say and your screwed. It is punishment plain and simple. When I was terminated from my rent because of my level and having a hard time finding a place, well the prosecutor said that’s no excuse. Even Vets with sever case of PTSDE have to put up with socalist laws. and we are suicidal enough without harassments. It causes more crime against people rather then secures peole, We need a Clarence Darrow with balls to fight hard against registration and have a dam good argument against it because it will haver to go to the Supreme court to end it and I think the recent appointments might do that. Been on the list for 24 years and they wont let me off. The Judge would not even accept my re evaluation.
Good phone meeting! ☎️
Thank you, Janice & Chance! 🙂
My attorney is in fact in California, Humboldt County just for the record I did not start registration until 2001 my second 214 D became a felony tacked on from a misdemeanor 214 D in 1980 my attorney informed me that I fall under the 10 year registration I am not on Megan’s law never was my attorney is a present in the mix of research I am awaiting her call or I call her back
Please what exactly is tiered registration and how may this effect myself and others
I heard a podcast on here which the speaker stated that registration would change if becomes expensive so why is California’s law on 10-20 years parole,in which the proponents claim is for public safety, if so why isn’t it applied retroactively? 3 strikes was declared not to be ex post facto so why not the new parole law? It’s not being applied retroactively because of the high cost to the state, if that’s the case then how is it meant for public safety then? I hope Ascol litigates to get the state to apply it retroactively?