Kids’ Online Safety Policy Bill is a Pretext for Censorship

Source: newrepublic.com 8/2/23

The first thing you need to know about the latest bill in Congress meant to protect children on the internet is that one of its co-sponsors has been waging this fight against tech platforms since the days of MySpace. This bill, the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, concerns children who were not yet born at the dawn of social media, whose parents could once have jockeyed to remain in each other’s Top 8, while their own parents in turn may have sounded the alarm about such newfound dangers as “emo” and camera phones.

For nearly as long as there have been websites, Congress has proposed laws to control what kids can see and do online. KOSA, in turn, has been billed as a new way to protect kids from a more pervasive and more dangerous internet. But in reality, KOSA hands powerful tools to the far right to further wage its war on kids, whether it’s censoring education on racism or demonizing queer and trans youth. Meanwhile, Democrats who support KOSA appear to either not have noticed or not minded.

To date, dozens of civil society groups have opposed KOSA due to the risks it poses to those who would be harmed by concentrating decision-making in this way.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Why don’t they start holding these parents accountable for not paying attention to what there children are doing online, Start change them with felony child neglect, and you’ll see internet crimes against children decline rapidly, KOSA should put that in their bill.

Last edited 1 year ago by AERO’S PHO

How about acknowledging the fact that everyone has sexual urges even from an early age and addressing that in a realistic manner instead of trying to find as many crimes as possible when a sexual event happens? Noone has the psychological capacity to approach this matter, to discuss arousal, or how it should be dealt with in a real world manner. So instead, now we have a bunch of people grown up who were never allowed to express their sexuality and now they’re prancing around as transgenders and we have that entire movement. Wonder how those individuals would be today if they’d been able to have some sexual outlet when they were younger? I’m not advocating a lowering of the age of consent, but I do think the pendulum has swung about as far to the right towards punishment as opposed to none at all. There should be a reasonable approach to these issues.

“As proposed, KOSA would require online platforms to “take reasonable measures” to “prevent and mitigate” harms to minors such as “anxiety, depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and suicidal behaviors,” along with “patterns of use that indicate or encourage addiction-like behaviors” and “physical violence, online bullying, and harassment of the minor.” State attorneys general would be the arbiters of alleged failures to “prevent and mitigate” such harms, with the power to impose penalties on platforms. Such actions could be initiated by the attorneys general themselves, if they feel that any resident of their state is “threatened or adversely affected by the engagement of any person in a practice that violates this Act.””

Might as well do what they did with cigarettes and music, put a warning label on the screen when the website comes up warning of the concerns and then let them do what they want anyway since they have free will. Then, they should extend this warning to everything the minors do and eat since they obviously don’t know diddly under 18 (despite the case where the 7th CCOA said even 14 and 15 years probably do know about sexual actions as I posted earlier this week).

Punishing the parents is a good way to start so they are held accountable and actually having them be parents, but it will only go so far. This is pretty much the start of a governmental state of control in what they propose and need it for election votes.

When government officials want to take more of a parental role of our country’s children my heart rate skyrockets. I wouldn’t trust the government taking care of any living due to the fact they will just want more involvement in one’s life and how exactly is that freedom. The government needs to go stop acting like babysitters and think they know what’s best. If their policies were the greatest our country wouldn’t be considered the laughing stock of the world.