AZ: Judge rejects claim that the Arizona sex offender registry violates constitutional rights

R H

Source: azmirror.com 11/11/25

The state is justified in tracking residencies and online identities of convicted child sex offenders, the court ruled

 

A federal judge shot down a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s sex offender registration laws, ruling that the state is justified in tracking the residencies and online identities of people convicted of crimes against children.

“It is plain that Arizona has a significant governmental interest in protecting children and preventing sex offender recidivism,” Judge Stephen McNamee wrote in a Nov. 6 order.

Two years ago, a man convicted of sexual conduct with a minor in 2016 filed a lawsuit against multiple sex offender registration statutes, arguing that they violate his free speech and due process rights. The man, who was granted anonymity by the court due to his fear of receiving threats of violence, is referred to as John Doe. He sought to nullify laws that require him to register as a sex offender for life, report any online identifiers he uses and register his residency every time he stays in a new county for three days or more. 

Online identifier reporting requirement
Under Arizona law, a person convicted of a crime against a minor must present themselves to the sheriff’s department of the county they live in to be fingerprinted and registered as a sex offender. During that time, they must also share every name they’re known by, the car they drive, if they have legal custody of a child, their address and any online identifier they use, along with every website that identifier is used on. 

Doe claimed that requiring him to share his online usernames and activity is tantamount to infringing on his freedom of speech, and said that he worried it could be used to expose his identity to the public. But McNamee rebutted that Arizona law doesn’t allow for the public disclosure of any personal information tied to the …

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Another judge who slept through law school.

0
Reply

Reading this makes me sad today. A federal judge with no independent thought or rational thinking. I expected more out of our court system. It feels hopeless.

0
Reply

Corrupt judge – can not admit the truth of constitutional rights violations.

0
Reply