CA RSOL supports AB 218

CA RSOL strongly supports the passing of AB 218 in the California Legislature. This bill would remove questions about criminal convictions from public job applications, postponing them until later in the hiring process. 

Through your support of AB 218, the State of California can begin to unlock employment opportunities for thousands of residents and help them obtain the second chance they deserve, thereby,significantly improving public safety and reducing the current recidivism rate. AB 218 was approved by the Assembly on May 30, 2013, and is now under consideration in the Senate.  The bill was approved by the Labor & Industrial Relations Committee on June 26, 2013, and then referred to the Committee on Judiciary, which you lead, before it can be considered by the full Senate.  

Attached please see more details about the bill as well as a letter sent to the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Feel free to use this letter as a guide to express your support for this bill.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I applaud the effort here. But aren’t felons–much less registrants–barred from all state and local government employment by law? The fact that they don’t ask about felony convictions until later in the hiring process only delays the inevitable. I’ll be happy to be corrected.

I recently came across a useful tool for people with questions about what is off limits based their conviction. Say for example; you want to know what types of professional license or type of employment you are excluded from. Unfortunately it’s not a resource for what you can do, only what you cant.

National Inventory of Collateral Consequences of Conviction
http://www.abacollateralconsequences.org/

Outstanding law proposal that puts people in the opportunity to
work…build self esteem ..the work keeping people busy and away
from trouble ..contributes back to society with dignity that this kind of proposed law can provide…its greatly needed.

Almost any job has probationary initial (how ya doing) work detail…
…..let that be the test for full time hire……..putting people to work
reduces crime greatly ……..its a win win for humanity.

You know… It would show proof that the reason they were fired is their criminal record… Its better then not making it past the hiring review because of the criminal record..