PA: Mandatory minimum sentences are ‘unconstitutional,’ court says

Admin

Locals charged with crimes involving drugs, guns or sex abuse could be due relief at sentencing, according to a high-court ruling.
A Pennsylvania Superior Court opinion has deemed mandatory minimum sentences “unconstitutional,” a ruling which could have major impact on countless cases here and across the state. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

So if we can get the registry classified as a punishment…could that undo AWA?

0

This is fantastic! I only hope other states, including this one, will follow suit!

0
Reply

Excellent decision! MM’s have become a coercive tool for DA’s to ramp up charges against defendants in order to get a plea and a conviction point for their resume. We need to rebuild a system with more discretion in evaluating the impact of the harm done with rational proportionality. I hope this decision goes viral.

0

Hooray for the Pennsylvania superior court that ruled these draconian laws unconstitutional. District attorneys have too much power as it is and have misapplied this power across the board in order to gain convictions. It’s beyond me how Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman can even say “In the short term, this is a huge blow to public safety and will have widespread ramifications for the law-abiding citizens of this county.” I’m sure the judge would not have ruled in favor of the people without good reason. This needs to happen here in California.

0

I am NOT a LAWYER but I have been saying this for years……..ISN’T Mandatory minimums a DIRECT VIOLATION of our Constitutions SEPARATION OF POWERS clause ?

0
Reply