NY: Housing Restrictions Keep Sex Offenders in Prison Beyond Release Dates

Dozens of sex offenders who have satisfied their sentences in New York State are being held in prison beyond their release dates because of a new interpretation of a state law that governs where they can live.

The law, which has been in effect since 2005, restricts many sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school. Those unable to find such accommodations often end up in homeless shelters. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“The various residency restrictions that have consigned many sex offenders to life as transients are now being interpreted to require their continued incarceration.”

————————————-
It appears the prison industry is capitalizing on this interpretation of residency restrictions to support a self indulgent existence. I could imagine it’s only a matter of time before they begin lobbying for residency restrictions for other categories of criminals, thus keeping their prisons full to meet quotas under the heading of “public safety”. I’m sure Senator Kline will receive a healthy campaign donation for his corroboration. I find this ideal to be very maddening and troublesome. Greed replaces the objective to reform an individual’s behavior.

Janice is in the wrong state. If where were in NYC, she could make millions off the stupidity of the NY legislature. These individuals aren’t even civilly committed.

Seriously? Keeping someone in jail beyond their sentence? In addition, none of these state-kidnapped citizens are allowed to get court-appointed lawyers, because they aren’t technically charged with a crime? SERIOUSLY??

And yes, they are “state kidnapped citizens,” as they are not being charged with a current crime, not EVEN a registration violation. They should be compensated hundreds of dollars a day for every day they remain as captives of the state.

And this doesn’t violate ex post faco and a myriad of other basic human rights embodied in our constitution and bill of rights?

Public policy leadership MUST be based…must have foundation on the Constitution.

Seems it wasn’t too long ago that Justice Scalia prophesied that internment could be used again in “times of war”. This prediction has reached fruition in the war against registrant citizens. If this can be done to “sex Offenders” based only on the fear of what they might do, then there’s no reason this wouldn’t apply to other groups of citizens we’re concerned about.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights restricts the use of internment. Article 9 states that “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.” Obviously this is another human right we’ve decided doesn’t belong in the good old U.S. (Sarcasm).

If a person is being detained longer due to his registration requirement, shouldn’t SCOTUS recognize this as proof that registration IS indeed punishment and gives states endless authority to punish registrants further than their sentence?

As I read this today 1/15/15 the day before my son was to be released from prison this has happened to him. He was only told 3 days ago. I was told today after many phone calls to find out where he was going. On top of this he has a mental illness and had stabilized very well even though staff at Attica let out the fact why he was there and he was assaulted many times while in prison because of his offence. This reminds me of when in WWII President Roosevelt held citizens of our country in interment.