Fountain Valley seeks to ban sex offenders from parks

FOUNTAIN VALLEY – Registered sex offenders who have committed crimes against children will be prohibited from entering parks in Fountain Valley, the City Council decided Tuesday.

The council unanimously approved the first reading of an ordinance, modeled after a county ban, but defines “park” to include other recreational areas where children may be. The city’s ordinance also differs from the county’s in that it specifically targets sex offenders who have committed crimes against children. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I would imagine ANYONE who had to go through child court and was ruled allowed to be around minors and their own children (BY A COURT) could challenge this law and win.

California RSOL stated its opposition to such an ordinance in a letter to Fountain Valley dated April 23. We then had a meeting with the mayor, city manager and city attorney on June 19 to repeat our opposition. California RSOL will testify at the next city council meeting, on October 16, to state its opposition once more. Please join us! It’s time to Show UP – Stand Up – Speak Up!!

The District Attorney of Orange County has pushed his agenda to all the cities throughout Orange County. Now 4 of the cities are being sued and the District Attorney Spokesperson had these comments concerning the lawyer filing the lawsuit. I find the attitude of this person very unsettling. Obviously she has limited intelligence to even consider saying this.

She said this:
Susan Kang Schroeder, chief of staff to the Orange County district attorney, defended the local laws as constitutional. Fourteen cities in Orange County have now adopted sex offender rules at the urging of the district attorney.

“Protecting children from sexual predators, I believe, is one of the most important duties of government,” Schroeder said.

She said the district attorney’s office will work with the cities to defend the sex offender laws.

“First of all, it doesn’t surprise me that a San Francisco lawyer would be filing a suit on behalf of a sex offender,” Schroeder said.

Dennis Riordan, the attorney who filed the suit, dismissed the remark.

“If that is the level of legal analysis on which these cities and county are going to be defended, they are going to be very poorly served in their representation,” he said.

The lawsuit asks the courts to permanently stop the four cities

The full article is in the L.A. Times

I would like to add that Dennis Riordan is no joke. He is one of the best lawyers in California. The OC district attorney really has a challenge here and for Susan Kang Schroeder, chief of staff to the Orange County district attorney to make such a statement shows just how incompetent she really is.