ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)


SCOTUS upholds DNA testing for serious arrests

The U.S. Constitution does not prohibit states from building large DNA databases by collecting samples from everyone arrested for serious crimes, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision Monday.

The case produced an unusual divide on the court, with liberal Justice Stephen Breyer joining the court’s Republican appointed justices who upheld the practice and conservative Justice Antonin Scalia writing a bitter dissent joined by most of the court’s liberals. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. Bluewall,0,6934225.story Apparently California has been doing this for roughly everything

  2. Robert Curtis

    I find it more and more distasteful to compromise even just a little on the registry laws and having tolerance for the registry in any form. I see that this passed via such a small margin. There are more and more clearly unconstitutional laws and policies passing Supreme Court Scrutiny. We need to find a way to balance out that injustice via public and social pressure. Any ideas?

  3. USA

    Highly disturbing. Its almost to the point that the Police can do whatever they want? Did you see the recent article where a law might be instituted where you are prohibited from taking photos of celebrity children and police officer’s children? Now, if you get arrested and they can take a DNA swab? Now, what if you are simply detained? Do you know the difference between detained and arrested (they arrest you and don’t formally charge you?) I think this is just another way where it provides officers with an excuse to charge someone with a serious crime if they suspect the person committed another crime? Hmmm.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *