2011: A Quiet but Growing Judicial Rebellion Against Harsh Sentences For CP Offenses

Federal criminal sentences should be “sufficient, but not greater than necessary.” They should fit the crime, provide for “adequate
deterrence,” “protect the public,” and promote rehabilitation. Since the Supreme Court decisions in Booker and Kimbrough, federal courts again have great discretion, within certain limits, to decide appropriate federal sentences. Congress, however, has taken pains to limit that discretion with regard to child pornography offenses, and the federal courts, in a series of judicial decisions across the country, including recent Second and Third Circuit decisions, are firmly rebelling. The questions arise: Are the courts right? Has Congress gone too far in its desire to punish this undesirable type of criminal conduct?

Full Article (pdf), Champion Magazine, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), Oct 2011

Related posts

Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ladies and gentlemen,
There is a profound truth about shining light. You walk in a closed in dark room and light the smallest of candles. say one that goes on a birthday cake. That little light chases away the greatest of darkness in that room. Ever notice darkness only runs from light never overcomes it. A shadow can be cast but what can a shadow do? nothing! although it can appear to be big at times, but it’s just a shadow. Lets shine a little more light of truth on the shadows of fear that seem to control the media and society as a whole. Standing together with truth in our hands and determination in our heart how can we fail? Who can stand against such? I believe in you (each of you) we need to believe in each other and STAND TOGETHER. TRUTH