ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


Conceived in Failure: The Adam Walsh Act’s Dangerous Consequences to Society

This short analysis of the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act of 2006 and its implementation in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania seeks to explore the background, philosophical failures and statistics to justify repeal of the AWA.  Additionally, there are significant policy recommendations that provide real reforms that provide enhanced community safety while not violating Constitutional principles or denying the ability for former offenders to successfully reenter society.  The AWA is a dangerous, destabilizing, retroactively applied law that: … Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Outstanding read! This person hits it clearly. I’m pleased that he pointed out the autors of AWA (Foley and Walsh) both committed sex offenses with minors and aren’t on any registries. John Walsh is a very, very bad man. Check out his history of failure and lies.

Stable Employment. Stable Housing. Treatment for Mental Conditions or Chemical Dependency. Positive Social Circles for Accountability and Support. All important conditions for allowing most sexual offenders to escape social controls. I think we can all agree that offenders need to realize they have broken sexual trusts which they need to work hard to regain. BUT!!! Law enforcement, legislators, judges and probably most of the public believe that the medical community is inept and therapy ineffective in it’s goal to control IMMORAL sexual activity. Therein lies the crux of the problem. While the medical community has learned a lot about sex… Read more »

Very good article about the facts and the situation; I strongly disagree with its proposals about how to reform SOR. After presenting a very strong argument completely against SOR, all the article is calling for is that it not be for lifetime, but it urges retaining SOR for a minimum of 10 years for least offenses and longer, maybe at least 30 years for more serious offenses. And that is not be on the Internet. Gee, it isn’t even logical; if you are going to present this strong a case that SOR is wrong and counter-productive and a waste of… Read more »

We as usual, you’re spot-on and the answer to your question as to why the brave paralegal modulated his vehemence thus is that if he didn’t he would never be able to run for Congress in twelve or fifteen years.

Sex Offenders are Objects of Hatred. Sex offender laws are hate-laws and the society needs them to make itself feel better.

I’m tellin’ ya’..we’re fighting this the wrong way! Every time a pyrrhic victory is achieved at the hands of the legal system, another nuclear device is detonated against us.

You are so right to refer to SOR as a hate law. Actually, I go farther and routinely call it a hate crime. That is its entire sales point: hate. And it is used for purposes of diverting of attention.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x