ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

National

Prison Quotas Push Lawmakers To Fill Beds, Derail Reform

After three violent inmates escaped from an Arizona private prison in July 2010, prompting a two-week, multi-state manhunt, state corrections officials demanded improvements and stopped sending new inmates to what they called a “dysfunctional” 3,300-bed facility. Less than a year later, the company that runs the prison, Management & Training Corp., threatened to sue the state. A line in their contract guaranteed that the prison would remain 97 percent full. They argued they had lost nearly $10 million from the reduced inmate population.

State officials renegotiated the contract, but ended up paying $3 million for empty beds as the company continued to address problems, according to state documents and local news accounts.

Far from the exception, Arizona’s contractually obligated promise to fill prison beds is a common provision in a majority of America’s private prison contracts, according to a public records analysis released today by the advocacy group In the Public Interest. The group reviewed more than 60 contracts between private prison companies and state and local governments across the country, and found language mentioning quotas for prisoners in nearly two-thirds of those analyzed. Full Article

Complete Report (pdf)

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Although I’m libertarian, I recognize that any task delegated to direct maintenance of the US Constitution, such as the defense of the nation as well as domestic law enforcement, must be directly held accountable by the governing bodies, and not through a profit-oriented business enterprise. The reason is very simple: There is a potential bias toward compromising the Constitution. In this case, the 8th amendment comes into play as legal entities would be pressured, financially, to incarcerate guilty offenders rather than give them a sentence more in line with their offense. For the most part, the free market has more… Read more »

On the other hand, no entity has a greater conflict of interest in perpetuating and expanding the police state than such organizations as the California Peace Officers Association, a decidedly non-commercial (though wildly lucrative) lobbying interest. I, too, am a Libertarian and I caution that imagining the civil libertarian horror story that is the U.S. today as an entirely capitalist construct is to miss substantially the fundamental reasons for its existence and fails to correctly identify the root cause of mass hysteria which is promulgated at the level of the citizen. Commercial interests are but one of the net beneficiaries… Read more »

As with all things, there are pro’s and con’s to the free market economy. Karl Marx did have some interesting ideas. You don’t necessarily have to agree with his “solutions” to recognize that he some very valid observations on the problems that a capitalist economy presents. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think Karl Marx ever came out and said that capitalism is inherently wrong, he only stated his observations. His ideas of socialism weren’t exactly the same thing that comes to mind when we think about the Soviet Union or The People’s Republic of China. Although, I… Read more »

Lets just cut to the chase, America is in the control business. There is no real freedom here and the government is more than happy to lock you up if you step out of line. Case in point: the war on drugs (what a stupid phrase) to clear proof of this. There is big money is locking casual drug users up…simple as that. Keeps up the illusion that cops are actually doing something useful, keeps people paranoid to only do the “legal drugs” drinking and smoking even though those 2 legal drugs account for most of the violence and health… Read more »

Most people would see a reduction in inmate populations as a result in the reduction of crimes committed…a good thing, right? Not according to our current corrupt government, if we have reduced crime rates, they seem to believe we need to do something about it so that crime rates increase, like creating new laws making more acts illegal!

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.